Open Relational God: Introduction

Note: You can view this teaching on our YouTube Channel.

     Monica was raped. Jimmy struggles with the threat of hell. Rochelle questions the relevance of prayer.  Kyler and his husband, Gary, adopted baby girls and wonder what to teach them about God. Chad lost his wife, Jenny, to COVID-induced complications. I bet you really don’t need many more details about these stories to recognize that they represent very difficult questions about the character and nature of God.  Many of the answers coming from conventional theology have left some people wanting and others walking away from faithful pursuits entirely.  What questions have you struggled with?  How many times have you had to play the mystery card, giving God a pass on tough questions?

     The reason I want to teach about Open and Relational Theology is because I think it could be extraordinarily helpful for your life. It has for mine.  There are very big questions about life and God that conventional Christian theology struggles to answer satisfactorily, leaving many people feeling unsure about themselves and God and life.  Our paradigms matter because they help us make sense of the world.  How we see the world shapes our vision for everything.  In the Church, sometimes certain questions have not been encouraged or even welcome, sometimes they are discouraged because the very question appears to imply doubt. A robust faith does not shy away from challenging questions, it runs toward them, not as enemies to be fought and conquered but as a new vista to behold. We can only play the mystery card for so long before we lose confidence in our faith.  Another major reason why I want to teach this is because the way we see God and everything else deeply affects how we think about ourselves and our place in the world.  There are some really valuable aspects of conventional theology which obviously resonate with a lot of people, and yet parts of it have also contributed to some of the most horrific acts of humanity ever committed, even with God’s “blessing.”  If large-scale atrocities can be mitigated against with some new ways of thinking, this venture is worth it.  Yet our individual lives can be deeply impacted as well.  We human beings tend to create God in our image, and then return the favor.  Parts of conventional theology may work to shape us into jerks more than Jesus.  If that’s the case, change is worth looking into.

     Theology is not fixed.  While there are some central themes about the character and nature of God in the Bible, there is no single, complete systematic theology offered in its pages.  Theology – the study of God – has always been fluid, shaped by new discoveries, insights, and experiences over time.  When popular models of theology are challenged, there is always a mixture of rejoicing and backlash.  Jesus certainly experienced this as he offered new ways to think about God and life.  When you feel a little anxious as certain tenets of comfortable theological are challenged, remember that such feelings are normal when new ideas are floated.  And remember that the author and perfecter of the Christian faith, Jesus, chose to push the envelope, discovering and proclaiming a bigger God so that we could, too.

     Over the next several weeks we will examine some conventional ways of thinking and consider some new ways.  The key components we will examine include the following:

·      Open. Our lives are not written. God does not know the specifics of the future.  Everything may “happen for a reason”, but it’s not necessarily God’s will or something predetermined.  The future is open and undetermined.  It doesn’t imply a lack of interconnectedness – on the contrary, it respects and is dependent upon it.  When we really believe that God is open, we become more empowered, not less. This is different than conventional views.

·      Relational. God is deeply engaged with all of creation because God is in all parts of creation.  The relationship is a two-way street – we are always affected by God and God is always affected by us. This means God is altered in some ways by creation itself. This is different than conventional views.

·      Amipotent. God is the most powerful force anywhere and everywhere, yet God’s power is self-limited by God’s uncontrolling love and our subsequent freedom. This is different than conventional views.

·      Present. God is in everything and everyone everywhere all the time and therefore deeply present with us in every moment, every experience – we are never alone.  This is very familiar and welcome by most people even if it is a departure from conventional theology.

·      Loving. The nature of God is uncontrolling love which we really love for ourselves, but don’t love as much for others.  This means we have freedom to do as we please, but it also means other people do, too. No matter what, God’s love prevails.  This feel like it should be part of conventional theology, but it is not.

     Each week we will consider the above subjects with the help of some biblical examples of each concept and the writing of Tom Oord in his book, Open and Relational Theology. On Wednesdays at noon and 7:00 we will work through the questions at the end of each of the respective chapters, where you will also find a link to content from Oord himself – podcasts, lectures, interviews, etc.  

     This matters to me.  I teach this because it is home for me.  It’s not like I found myself swimming in ORT one Tuesday morning a few years ago.  Over (decades of) time I gradually began to question the conventional views that had shaped me and began wondering about what “more” there might be.  I believe I am one of a large, growing number of people who are on that adventure.  Oord’s books have helped give me words to express what I’m thinking, feeling, and experiencing.  His work has provided a well-reasoned-and-articulated framework that makes a lot of sense and enlivens my faith.  I want that for everyone.  I hope you’ll join me for the ongoing conversation.

 

 

Open My Eyes That I May See

Open my eyes that I may see

Glimpses of truth Thou hast for me

Place in my hands the wonderful key

That shall unclasp and set me free

 

Silently now I wait for Thee

Ready my God Thy will to see

Open my eyes illumine me

Spirit divine

 

Open my ears that I may hear

Voices of truth Thou sendest clear

And while the wave notes fall on my ear

Everything false will disappear

 

Open my mouth and let me bear

Gladly the warm truth everywhere

Open my heart and let me prepare

Love with Thy children thus to share

God With Us: Oh Holy, Silent Night

     How many Christmases have you celebrated?  My answer is the same as my age, approximately 44 if you round things down correctly.  Or 52.  Whatever. For some, it’s not the same as your age, especially if this Christian holiday wasn’t part of your family of origin’s tradition.  Maybe you grew up Jewish or Buddhist or Muslim or something else.  Maybe there was a time in your life – maybe it’s now – that you really struggled to celebrate this holiday for one or more of a variety of reasons.  Perhaps you can’t believe the whole virgin birth story.  Or Christianity in general given its checkered history of doing some wonderful things in the world while sometimes – even at the same time – doing or promoting or silently endorsing some truly horrific things.  Maybe you don’t have room for religion at all – it seems so out of step given the advances of science, and may feel irrelevant in our area where we have so much – why do we even need God?  Or maybe you’ve distanced yourself because of the commercialization of Christmas.  I understand that next year Wal-Mart will start selling Christmas trees mid-January with a Martin Luther King Jr. Weekend Sale!  That may not be accurate, but I bet someone is thinking about it...  Jim Gaffigan highlighted some of the surprising things that have come to be associated with Christmas during his comedy segment on CBS Sunday Morning – anything resonate with you?  I hope this Christmas you can let yourself take a deep breath and hit pause on all those concerns, if just for 36 hours.  Because there are some great, hopeful messages that the Christmas story offers.

     Jesus’ birth narrative and his subsequent ministry represented the breaking of a new dawn for humanity. Paradigms about the character, nature, and location of God were shattered.  Ideas about who God would honor with a visit were obliterated as an old couple of little societal importance was invited into the story, as was a very young woman and her fiancé, plus lowly shepherds watching sheep deep in the night, and even foreign, non-Jewish scholars who noticed a new star that was not meaningful to Jews but surely was to non-Jews.  All these characters were invited to wonder anew about God and how they made sense of the world.  More, this God invited them into the development of the storyline – this wasn’t something that was simply happening to them – they got to choose to engage or not.  This meant that they had inherent power and agency even to say no to God. It is hard for us to appreciate how significant all of this was back then because we take so much of it for granted now.

     The whopper game-changing stuff happened in and through Jesus, however.  While there is still debate about the veracity of the birth narratives, there is little debate about the impact of the man whose birth we celebrate.  Most people basically like the person of Jesus even if they can’t stand his Christian devotees!  Why? Because he was best known for showing love, kindness, and support for those in his world who rarely received such things.  Jesus was a voice of equality, equity, and inclusion long before civil rights movements were moving.  His accessibility, teaching, healing, choice of venues, language and style – all of it communicated the message that God loves everyone equally, fully, and irreducibly.  More, Jesus claimed that the Spirit of God was what was behind all the wonderous things about him, that the Spirit was in him.  Pretty hard to argue with given all for which Jesus was known.  He went further.  He told his disciples (and by extension everyone else) that the indwelling Spirit was available to everyone – and in fact was already in residence, ready to be awakened and activated.  To actualize this relationship with the divine within had such transformative power that for those who did so it was as if they had been born again.  Such an inherent, innate gift from God further strengthened the power of everyone’s equality – if God chose to inhabit everyone, what does that say about how God feels about everyone? The idea that God was not in heaven “up there” but everywhere – even in creation itself – was not particularly new.  But the idea that everyone is anointed with the Spirit of God was very new.  This is hard for us in our time to appreciate when we sort of assume it.  It wasn’t always that way.

     Following the guide of the Spirit paved the Way for everyone to follow that leads to an abundant life for all.  Life lived guided by the Spirit leads to the fruit of love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, gentleness, and self-control – all the sorts of things that are the foundation of all the desires we have for life.  What dawned with Jesus’ birth and subsequent life was possibility, capacity, knowing that our foundation is love and so is our unshakable destination.  This is still big news, still blowing minds, still shattering paradigms.

     How might we choose to enter the story this year and allow our minds to be stretched, our hearts warmed with the news that God is as close as the manger, for all people.  How might that soften our gaze toward each other and ourselves?  How might that truly bring more joy to the world when together we choose to welcome the Christ child – not just two thousand years ago but tonight, in our own lives, to be born in us.  With such openness in mind, hear the story again as if for the first time:

     At that time the Roman emperor, Augustus, decreed that a census should be taken throughout the Roman Empire. (This was the first census taken when Quirinius was governor of Syria.) All returned to their own ancestral towns to register for this census. And because Joseph was a descendant of King David, he had to go to Bethlehem in Judea, David’s ancient home. He traveled there from the village of Nazareth in Galilee. He took with him Mary, to whom he was engaged, who was now expecting a child.

     And while they were there, the time came for her baby to be born. She gave birth to her firstborn son. She wrapped him snugly in strips of cloth and laid him in a manger, because there was no lodging available for them.

     That night there were shepherds staying in the fields nearby, guarding their flocks of sheep. Suddenly, an angel of the Lord appeared among them, and the radiance of the Lord’s glory surrounded them. They were terrified, but the angel reassured them. “Don’t be afraid!” he said. “I bring you good news that will bring great joy to all people. The Savior—yes, the Messiah, the Lord—has been born today in Bethlehem, the city of David! And you will recognize him by this sign: You will find a baby wrapped snugly in strips of cloth, lying in a manger.”

     Suddenly, the angel was joined by a vast host of others—the armies of heaven—praising God and saying,

“Glory to God in highest heaven and peace on earth to those with whom God is pleased.”

     When the angels had returned to heaven, the shepherds said to each other, “Let’s go to Bethlehem! Let’s see this thing that has happened, which the Lord has told us about.”

     They hurried to the village and found Mary and Joseph. And there was the baby, lying in the manger. After seeing him, the shepherds told everyone what had happened and what the angel had said to them about this child. All who heard the shepherds’ story were astonished, but Mary kept all these things in her heart and thought about them often. The shepherds went back to their flocks, glorifying and praising God for all they had heard and seen. It was just as the angel had told them. (Luke 2:1-20 NLT)

God With Us: So what? Now What?

Note: You can watch this teaching on CrossWalk’s YouTube channel.

     We began this Advent series recognizing that we human beings struggle with a tension when it comes to our understanding of God.  We resonate with paradigms, but with time discover that every construct/metaphor has its limits, and we move into mystery – this is the dance between the kataphatic and the apophatic traditions.  Part of this tension is on full display in the birth narratives of Jesus.  For the three centuries leading up to Jesus’ birth, people assumed that God was silent and distant.  If God were going to speak, God would do so through the expected channels – prophets, priests, and kings – and surely in the Temple.  The characters that paved the way for Jesus’ birth experienced God in unexpected ways.  On old couple long past child-bearing years is told they would be expecting.  They had to be on board for that to happen – they had to do their part for the child to be conceived: a “leap” of faith (keeping it clean here!).  Mary was also told that she would conceive, and that God would not be absent in the process but rather very much involved.  Her response was one of deep, reverent submission to the controversy that lie ahead.  Her fiancé, Joseph, was inclined to walk away from Mary given what he knew but was invited to trust that God was somehow in the process, and invited him to be, too – an act of deep, humble obedience.  The lowly shepherds in the field tending their flocks were the last to expect God to show up, especially with a choir of angelic warriors!  They were invited to be the first visitors of the newborn, and therefore the first messengers of his birth.  None of the characters expected God to show up in these ways.  None of them expected God to be so intimately involved, so present in their lives.  None of them could have imagined such invitations extended by God, either, yet they were.  Each character had to be open.  Each character had to have faith.  Each character had to embrace the invitation, or the story wouldn’t be what we remember today.

     I don’t think it was much different for Jesus, regardless of how you determine how he was conceived.  Even if much more, he was still flesh and blood, still human, still needing to be open, to have faith, to be able to perceive what he was being invited to embrace, and embrace it.  If we roll with the story, we would assume that he was more aware than most of how present God is in everyday life and would therefore have greater sensitivity to what God was doing in the world and in his life.  We should naturally expect him to have a leg up on most human beings given his faith-filled upbringing.  It makes sense that he would have greater insight, greater capacity to be a conduit for the Spirit, and greater flexibility since his origin story was such a mind-blower.  Identifying how incredible Jesus was is important. In the Christian tradition, identifying him as our pioneer and perfecter of our faith is central to how we perceive God.  But Jesus never taught that the point of his life was that we would simply come to utter a belief statement or ask for forgiveness so that we could go to heaven someday.  His whole agenda was to advance the Kingdom of God by modeling the Way of walking with God, of displaying what it meant to be incarnated with the presence of God, so that humanity would not simply believe in him intellectually, but to follow that Way.  The Way is radically different than the MO of the world, so much so that Jesus said it was like being born again.  It is a way of life that honors the incarnation in each of us, seeing ourselves and others as holy, worthy of dignity and respect, and seeks to live responsively to the flow of the Spirit of God that resides within each of us.

     Why would anyone do the hard work required to live according to the Kingdom of God, to walk in the Way of Jesus, the Way of faith, the Way of the flow of the Spirit?  Why bother?  Do you want more love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control in your life and in the world?  The Apostle Paul called these the fruit of the Spirit, byproducts of living life in response to the Spirit’s ever-active presence in and around us. What does the Way look like and how do we learn more about it?  Learn everything you can about how Jesus lived his life and emulate it.  If you are paying attention, you will realize that you will never outgrow it or come to the end of the depths of the Way as it gets deeper as we grow deeper.  It is as simple as following in the footsteps of Jesus, which is only difficult because it is so counter-intuitive and counter-cultural at times.  Yet it delivers on abundant life, meaning, hope – everything worth actually living for.  You are invited to live in God With Us.

     To recap, we need to be open to how we think about God because our constructs are helpful but also inherently limiting.  We need to be open to how God might interact in the world – God is everywhere, in everything, in us – this is the panentheistic view which replaces a more common dualistic view where God is separated from us.  Jesus grew into his understanding of being one with God and achieved it as much as humanly possible.  His prayer was that his followers experience the same, which means it is not only possible, but also the longing of God.  In order to experience the responsive, abundant life-in-the-Spirit like Jesus did, we need to follow his example, not simply believe in him.

Need a little inspiration? Listen to this song Voctave’s This Is My Wish. You’re welcome.

Questions to consider...

1.     How are you affected by the fact that Jesus prayed that you would be one with God as he was one with God, which means it is both possible and longed for by God?

2.     How have you already experienced this reality in part?  Are there areas of your life where you began to follow Jesus more closely and it resulted in some of the fruits of the Spirit showing up in your life?

3.     What areas of your life do you know you need some of the fruits of the Spirit sooner than later?  How can you follow Jesus more closely in that area of life?

4.     Who do you know that would appreciate this Good News?  How might you begin to share it with them in word and deed?

Resources to use for reflection...

Galatians 5:13-26 (MSG)

     It is absolutely clear that God has called you to a free life. Just make sure that you don't use this freedom as an excuse to do whatever you want to do and destroy your freedom. Rather, use your freedom to serve one another in love; that's how freedom grows. For everything we know about God's Word is summed up in a single sentence: Love others as you love yourself. That's an act of true freedom. If you bite and ravage each other, watch out—in no time at all you will be annihilating each other, and where will your precious freedom be then?

     My counsel is this: Live freely, animated and motivated by God's Spirit. Then you won't feed the compulsions of selfishness. For there is a root of sinful self-interest in us that is at odds with a free spirit, just as the free spirit is incompatible with selfishness. These two ways of life are antithetical, so that you cannot live at times one way and at times another way according to how you feel on any given day. Why don't you choose to be led by the Spirit and so escape the erratic compulsions of a law-dominated existence?

     It is obvious what kind of life develops out of trying to get your own way all the time: repetitive, loveless, cheap sex; a stinking accumulation of mental and emotional garbage; frenzied and joyless grabs for happiness; trinket gods; magic-show religion; paranoid loneliness; cutthroat competition; all-consuming-yet-never-satisfied wants; a brutal temper; an impotence to love or be loved; divided homes and divided lives; small-minded and lopsided pursuits; the vicious habit of depersonalizing everyone into a rival; uncontrolled and uncontrollable addictions; ugly parodies of community. I could go on.

     This isn't the first time I have warned you, you know. If you use your freedom this way, you will not inherit God's kingdom.

     But what happens when we live God's way? He brings gifts into our lives, much the same way that fruit appears in an orchard—things like affection for others, exuberance about life, serenity. We develop a willingness to stick with things, a sense of compassion in the heart, and a conviction that a basic holiness permeates things and people. We find ourselves involved in loyal commitments, not needing to force our way in life, able to marshal and direct our energies wisely.

     Legalism is helpless in bringing this about; it only gets in the way. Among those who belong to Christ, everything connected with getting our own way and mindlessly responding to what everyone else calls necessities is killed off for good—crucified.

     Since this is the kind of life we have chosen, the life of the Spirit, let us make sure that we do not just hold it as an idea in our heads or a sentiment in our hearts, but work out its implications in every detail of our lives. That means we will not compare ourselves with each other as if one of us were better and another worse. We have far more interesting things to do with our lives. Each of us is an original.

Philippians 2:1-15 (MSG)

     If you've gotten anything at all out of following Christ, if his love has made any difference in your life, if being in a community of the Spirit means anything to you, if you have a heart, if you care— then do me a favor: Agree with each other, love each other, be deep-spirited friends. Don't push your way to the front; don't sweet-talk your way to the top. Put yourself aside, and help others get ahead. Don't be obsessed with getting your own advantage. Forget yourselves long enough to lend a helping hand.

     Think of yourselves the way Christ Jesus thought of himself. He had equal status with God but didn't think so much of himself that he had to cling to the advantages of that status no matter what. Not at all. When the time came, he set aside the privileges of deity and took on the status of a slave, became human! Having become human, he stayed human. It was an incredibly humbling process. He didn't claim special privileges. Instead, he lived a selfless, obedient life and then died a selfless, obedient death—and the worst kind of death at that: a crucifixion.

     Because of that obedience, God lifted him high and honored him far beyond anyone or anything, ever, so that all created beings in heaven and on earth—even those long ago dead and buried—will bow in worship before this Jesus Christ and call out in praise that he is the Master of all, to the glorious honor of God the Father.

     What I'm getting at, friends, is that you should simply keep on doing what you've done from the beginning. When I was living among you, you lived in responsive obedience. Now that I'm separated from you, keep it up. Better yet, redouble your efforts. Be energetic in your life of salvation, reverent and sensitive before God. That energy is God's energy, an energy deep within you, God himself willing and working at what will give him the most pleasure.

Do everything readily and cheerfully—no bickering, no second-guessing allowed! Go out into the world uncorrupted, a breath of fresh air in this squalid and polluted society. Provide people with a glimpse of good living and of the living God. Carry the light-giving Message into the night.

Philippians 4:8-9 (NLT)

“Fix your thoughts on what is true, and honorable, and right, and pure, and lovely, and admirable. Think about things that are excellent and worthy of praise. Keep putting into practice all you learned and received from me—everything you heard from me and saw me doing. Then the God of peace will be with you.”

Annotated Lord’s Prayer

By Nadia Bolz-Weber

     Our Father, Our Mother, Our Holy Parent, The Source of All Being from whom we came and to whom we return, You who knows us better than we know ourselves. Jesus called you Abba and so shall we, even as we may have an ambiguous relationship with parenthood - Be to us our Holy Parent, the one who loves without condition. 

     Who art in heaven… Our Father who art in everything. Our Father who art in orphanages and neonatal units, and jail cells and luxury high-rises, who art in law offices and adult bookstores, and in rooms alone with suicidal people. Our Father who art in the halls of Congress and the halls of tenements. 

     Hallowed be thy name. Holy is your name.  Ever since the beginning we have attributed our own sin and ego and wishful thinking and greed and malice and racism and ambition and manipulations of others to you and to your name – and yet your name remains holy. We print “In God we trust” on the US dollar and then worship that dollar and the power that dollar brings us, and yet still, your name remains holy. 

     Thy kingdom come… God, right now we beg you to bring more than just a small measure of heaven to earth because, if you haven’t noticed, we are in the middle of a global pandemic and millions are sick and dying, not to mention, the Earth is on fire. It’s a mess down here Lord, so we need your Kingdom to speed the hell up. We need wise leaders, and just systems and an extra dose of compassion for all of us.

     Thy will be done on Earth as it is in Heaven. Thy will and not ours be done. Forgive us when we use prayer as a self-help technique by which we can get all the cash and prizes we want out of your divine vending machine if we just kind of bug you to death through ceaseless prayer, because when it comes down to it, we know better. You are our Father whose name is holy and whose love is boundless and who wants, as our holy Parent, to hear our prayers.

     Give us today our daily bread. Give us today our daily bread, our daily naan, our daily tortillas, our daily rice. Lord, give us real bread, even when we keep reaching for those literal and metaphorical Krispy Kremes. Give us the gift of enough-ness. May our response to perceived scarcity always be increased generosity for we are your children and from you we receive everything. Give us today our desire for the neighbor to be fed. Give us today a desire for a good that is held in common.

     And forgive us our sins. As we forgive those who sin against us. Forgive us when we hate what you love. Forgive us when we would rather anesthetize ourselves than feel anything. Forgive us for how much we resent in others the same things we hate in ourselves Forgive us for the terrible things we think about our own bodies, bodies you have made in your image. Forgive us for thinking we know the hearts of our enemies. 

     And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil. Deliver us from the inclination that we too do not have evil in our hearts. Deliver us from religious and national exceptionalism. Deliver us from addiction and depression. Deliver us from self-loathing. Deliver us from self- righteousness. Deliver us from high fructose corn syrup. Deliver us from a complete lack of imagination about where you are in our lives and how you might already be showing up. Deliver us from complacency. Deliver us from Complicity. As Jesus taught us, we are throwing this bag of prayers at your door. We are not asking nicely, Lord. We are your children and we are claiming your promises as our own today. Some of us are holding your feet to the fire, some of us don’t know if we believe in you, some of us are distracted and just going through the motions, some are desperately in love with you.... but all of us are your children. Use these prayers to hammer us all into vessels that can accept the answer when it comes (Fred Craddock). 

     For Thine is the kingdom and the power and the glory forever and ever. 

     And the children of God say, AMEN. 

St. Patrick’s Breastplate Prayer Song/Video:

Christ with me
Christ before me, Christ behind me, Christ in me

Christ beneath me, Christ above me
Christ on my right, Christ on my left
Christ when I lie down, Christ when I sit down, Christ when I arise
Christ in the heart of every man who thinks of me
Christ in the mouth of everyone who speaks of me
Christ in every eye that sees me
Christ in every ear that hears me

God With Us: Word. Jesus. Christ.

Note: You can watch this teaching on CrossWalk’s YouTube channel.

Some problems take time to sort out, some issues take a while to resolve.  If we are lifelong learners, we can be confident that as we come to grips with new information and as our perspective changes with maturity, we will forever be in process.  The process seems to be one where we construct ways of thinking, eventually deconstruct them as necessary given new information and experience, and reconstruct our paradigms based on the process we’ve undergone.  We enjoy our newly constructed schema for a while until – uh oh – we are introduced to new information and experiences that start the process all over again.  This has been called “the perennial tradition” by Richard Rohr and others, and I think it’s accurate.

     My understanding of Jesus has gone through several rounds of this process. I am very familiar with the range of perspectives about Jesus – kind of important for a Christian pastor.  Earlier in my life I simply accepted the birth narratives as literal fact.  In time I heard about scholars who challenged the virgin birth, but I dismissed them because it seemed like they were challenging the authority of scripture as reliable and true, and therefore they were suspect and probably heretics as far as I was concerned.  Over time and with more study, however, I began to understand the Bible differently – its own series of the perennial process – and had room to entertain the ideas I had previously rejected.  We generally don’t have Eureka moments where we shift from one perspective immediately to another – major shifts take time because that level of change is very complex.  Today I want to tell you how I understand Jesus this Christmas, knowing that in time this will change if I am open to new information and experience.  Before I begin, I want to assure you of two things that I generally get questioned about: the Bible and Jesus.  While I do not believe the Bible to be inerrant or infallible – these more modern concepts were foreign to Jesus and Paul and the entire rabbinical tradition and therefore should be challenged – I absolutely engage the Bible as sacred text.  For Christians it remains our primary text to understand first the development of Judaism, and how the first followers of Jesus thought and lived so that we can think and live faithfully today.  But because I don’t ascribe to the Fundamental/Evangelical doctrine of the Bible, I sometimes get dismissed as not teaching the Bible.  I have been a pastor for over 26 years.  I earned my doctorate studying the soteriology based on the Gospel of John.  Between Sunday sermons, memorial services, weddings, and other special events, I have offered over 1500 original teachings, each averaging 16-20 hours of research and preparation. I don’t repeat a teaching.  With literally only a handful of exceptions when I may have given a talk on another religious tradition, I have taught strictly from the Bible, even when offering a series that dovetails with a book.  I am a Bible-teaching pastor.  If anybody doubts it, they are welcome to view hundreds of hours of teachings on CrossWalk’s YouTube channel to try to prove me wrong.  If you can do so, I will buy you an ice cream cone from McDonalds.  As far as Jesus goes, I chose to follow in his footsteps at age 10, had a profound experience of the Holy Spirit at age 15 which amped up my relationship with God exponentially, sensed a call to become a pastor the summer before my Sophomore year of High School, had another dramatic experience of the Holy Spirit in college which further refined my faith and passion, and have remained an ordained pastor since July 23, 1995.  My commitment to following the Way of Jesus has never been stronger or deeper.  I will go to my grave proclaiming my faith even if that proclamation leads to the grave.  I say these things because I do not agree with some classic views of Jesus that developed hundreds of years after his ministry that stuck for various reasons, or some newer revisions over the last few hundred years that have also gained traction.  What I have resonated with more and more has been the original Jesus and those who experienced the power of his Gospel over the centuries.  Many who challenged orthodoxy when it went against the grain of Jesus were silenced or killed. What I believe may be new to some of you, but it is not new.

     Jesus was born and raised by Mary and Joseph. Was there divine intervention of some sort?  Of course. Does that mean that Jesus was born of a virgin Mary?  Not necessarily.  Such a birth does not need to be literally true in my understanding.  Could it be?  Who am I to say?  Yet I join the likes of Marcus Borg and N.T. Wright (and many others) stating that my faith is not deeply shaped by the birth narratives.  At minimum, Matthew and Luke’s authors were signaling to the readers that God was up to something in Jesus’ birth, and it required the cooperation of both Mary and Joseph to pull it off – that’s a powerful message to proclaim.  Jesus grew up and when he was in later adulthood for his time, he began his public ministry for which he is best known.

     What was so special about Jesus is his relationship with God and his modeling of faith that allowed the Spirit to have full sway over his life as much as possible.  It was this responsiveness to the Spirit that gave him insights that blew people’s minds about the scope of God’s expansive love, gave a new view of scripture, gave him power and courage to challenge political and religious authorities, allowed him to be a conduit of healing and forgiveness from the Spirit in unprecedented ways, allowed him to silently resist torture and death as a form of peaceful protest, and opened his followers’ eyes to his life after death.  There has never been another who opened the Spirit of God to others like Jesus did. Therefore he is called Christ, or Messiah – we’ve never seen one so anointed as we have in Jesus.  His life, death, and teachings opened the door for everyone else to welcome the Spirit into their lives as well and respond in similar ways toward similar ends.  Jesus was the great witness to what living in fully open relationship with God looked like.  This was very new. It marked a shift in consciousness that was not lost on his closest followers who learned the way and followed.  He certainly validated his title of Christ, and his birthday is surely worth celebrating.

     But I don’t think Jesus wanted to be worshipped as God.  He said as much during his life.  What is difficult for his original audience as well as today’s is differentiating where the physical Jesus ends, and the infusion of the Spirit begins.  There are statements that Jesus made that surely seem to reflect a first century context more than an eternally benevolent God – so there are moments of distinction on that note.  While an easy and honest mistake, I wonder if contemporary Christianity is guilty of Jesusolatry – worshipping Jesus instead of the God who inhabited him.

     This rendering of Jesus takes nothing away from him as far as I am concerned.  He is still special and deserving of allegiance.  One massive benefit of viewing Jesus in this way is that it makes his final prayer attainable – his dying wish that his disciples would be one with God just like he was.  If such union required a virgin birth, we’re all screwed!  If, however, what Jesus was getting at was that what he experienced was available to all people, then that means it is actually possible.  That is incredibly powerful news.  I can celebrate Jesus and worship God.  And, because Jesus was so inhabited, infused, open, and welcoming of the Spirit of God, I think we can still say that when we see Jesus, we see the face of God.  No demigod required. More, it means that we human beings can actualize the Spirit similarly, experiencing and exemplifying the presence of God incarnate, becoming united as one, as much as we are able, for the restoration of ourselves and the world in which we live.  May it be so.  May we do our part to be the answer to Jesus’ last prayer.

Some questions to process...

1.     How were you introduced to the historical person of Jesus?  Was he framed as a fully human and fully God character unlike any other human being in history, therefore making him sinless which paved the way for his death on the cross to become a final sacrifice for the forgiveness of sins so that we would be welcome in heaven one day (if we consciously accept the offer of forgiveness)? Or was he framed as just a human being, a Jewish reformer who spoke into his context in ways that so rattled those in political and religious authority that he and his threat were eliminated?

2.     The idea of a demigod was anathema to Jewish theology even if it was welcome and common in Roman and Greek mythology. If Jesus was a demigod, does this mean God went against Godself? If Jesus was not a demigod, how does that impact our view of who is was, what he had to say and do, and why he mattered?

3.     “Christ” isn’t Jesus’ last name, but a denotation that something especially God-anointed was happening in him.  It also may mean that we rethink the nature of Jesus and Christ as separate statements.  How does that mess with you?

4.     What if Christ is the eternal presence of God that is everywhere, in everyone, in every part of creation?  What does that mean for how you see yourself?  All other people? Creation?

Other Stuff to Consider…

Selections from John’s Prologue; Colossians 1:15-20 (NLT)

In the beginning the Word/Blueprint/Way already existed.

The Word/Blueprint/Way was with God,

and the Word/Blueprint/Way was God.

[Love] existed in the beginning with God.

God created everything through [Love]

and nothing was created except through [Love].

The Word/Blueprint/Way gave life to everything that was created,

and [Love’s] life brought light to everyone.

The Light/Love shines in the darkness,

and the darkness can never extinguish it.

The one who is the True Light,

who gives Light to everyone,

was coming into the world.

 

 

Christ/Love Incarnate is the visible image of the invisible God.

Love existed before anything was created & is supreme over all creation,

for through Love God created everything

in the heavenly realms and on earth.

Love made the things we can see

and the things we can’t see—

such as thrones, kingdoms, rulers, and authorities in the unseen world.

Everything was created through Love and for Love.

Love existed before anything else,

and Love holds all creation together.

Christ is also the head of the church,

which is Love’s body.

Love is the beginning,

supreme over all who rise from the dead.

So Love is first in everything.

For God in all Love’s fullness

was pleased to live in Christ,

and through Love God reconciled

everything to Godself.

God made peace with everything in heaven and on earth

by means of Love’s/Christ’s emptying/blood on the cross.

St. Patrick’s Breastplate Prayer: 

Christ with me
Christ before me, Christ behind me, Christ in me

Christ beneath me, Christ above me
Christ on my right, Christ on my left
Christ when I lie down, Christ when I sit down, Christ when I arise
Christ in the heart of every man who thinks of me
Christ in the mouth of everyone who speaks of me
Christ in every eye that sees me
Christ in every ear that hears me

Selected Sayings of Jesus from the Gospel of John*

     “Anyone who drinks this water will soon become thirsty again. But those who drink the water I give will never be thirsty again. It becomes a fresh, bubbling spring within them, giving them eternal life... The time is coming—indeed it’s here now—when true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and in truth. The Father is looking for those who will worship him that way. For God is Spirit, so those who worship him must worship in spirit and in truth...

     “I have a kind of food you know nothing about... My nourishment comes from doing the will of God, who sent me, and from finishing his work.”

     “I tell you the truth, the Son can do nothing by himself. He does only what he sees the Father doing. Whatever the Father does, the Son also does... I tell you the truth, those who listen to my message and believe in God who sent me have eternal life. They will never be condemned for their sins, but they have already passed from death into life.”

     “Anyone who is thirsty may come to me! Anyone who believes in me may come and drink! For the Scriptures declare, ‘Rivers of living water will flow from his heart.’”

     “I am the light of the world. If you follow me, you won’t have to walk in darkness, because you will have the light that leads to life.”

     “You are truly my disciples if you remain faithful to my teachings. And you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”

     “I am the resurrection and the life. Anyone who believes in me will live, even after dying. Everyone who lives in me and believes in me will never ever die.”

     “I am giving you a new commandment: Love each other. Just as I have loved you, you should love each other. Your love for one another will prove to the world that you are my disciples.”

     “Jesus told him, ‘I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one can come to the Father except through me. If you had really known me, you would know who my Father is. From now on, you do know him and have seen him!’”

     “I have loved you even as the Father has loved me. Remain in my love. When you obey my commandments, you remain in my love, just as I obey my Father’s commandments and remain in his love. I have told you these things so that you will be filled with my joy. Yes, your joy will overflow! This is my commandment: Love each other in the same way I have loved you. There is no greater love than to lay down one’s life for one’s friends. You are my friends if you do what I command. I no longer call you slaves, because a master doesn’t confide in his slaves. Now you are my friends, since I have told you everything the Father told me. You didn’t choose me. I chose you. I appointed you to go and produce lasting fruit, so that the Father will give you whatever you ask for, using my name. This is my command: Love each other.

     “And this is the way to have eternal life—to know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, the one you sent to earth... “I have given them the glory you gave me, so they may be one as we are one. I am in them and you are in me. May they experience such perfect unity that the world will know that you sent me and that you love them as much as you love me.

*Jn 4:13-14, 23-24, 32, 34; 5:19, 24; 7:37-38; 8:12, 31-32; 11:25-26; 13:34-35; 14:6-7; 15:9-17; 17:3, 17-23 (NLT)

 Who Is Christ? By Richard Rohr (Meditation 12/2/2018)

     What if we’ve missed the point of who Christ is, what Christ is, and where Christ is? I believe that a Christian is simply one who has learned to see Christ everywhere. Understanding the Universal or Cosmic Christ can change the way we relate to creation, to other religions, to other people, to ourselves, and to God. Knowing and experiencing this Christ can bring about a major shift in consciousness. Like Saul’s experience on the road to Damascus (see Acts 9), we won’t be the same after encountering the Risen Christ.

     The Universal Christ is present in both Scripture and Tradition, and the concept has been understood by many mystics, though not as a focus of mainline Christianity. (See John 1:1-5, Colossians 1:15-20, Ephesians 1:9-12 if you think this is some new idea.) We just didn’t have the eyes to see it.

     The Universal Christ is Divine Presence pervading all of creation since the very beginning. My father Francis of Assisi (1181–1226) intuited this presence and lived his life in awareness of it. Later, John Duns Scotus (1266–1308) put this intuition into philosophical form. For Duns Scotus, the Christ Mystery was the blueprint of reality from the very start (John 1:1). Teilhard de Chardin (1881–1955) brought this insight into our modern world.

     God’s first “idea” was to become manifest—to pour out divine, infinite love into finite, visible forms. The “Big Bang” is now our scientific name for that first idea; and “Christ” is our Christian theological name. Both are about love and beauty exploding outward in all directions. Creation is indeed the Body of God!

     In Jesus, this eternal omnipresence had a precise, concrete, and personal referent. God’s presence became more obvious and believable in the world. The formless took on form in someone we could “hear, see, and touch” (1 John 1:1), making God easier to love.

     But it seems we so fell in love with this personal interface in Jesus that we forgot about the eternal Christ, the Body of God, which is all of creation, which is really the “First Bible.” Jesus and Christ are not exactly the same. In the early Christian era, only a few Eastern Fathers (such as Origen of Alexandria and Maximus the Confessor) noticed that the Christ was clearly historically older, larger, and different than Jesus himself. They mystically saw that Jesus is the union of human and divine in space and time; Christ is the eternal union of matter and Spirit from the beginning of time.

     When we believe in Jesus Christ, we’re believing in something much bigger than the historical incarnation that we call Jesus. Jesus is the visible map. The entire sweep of the meaning of the Anointed One, the Christ, includes us and includes all of creation since the beginning of time (see Romans 1:20). This Advent, let us wait in anticipation for the eternally coming Christ.

God With Us: Where, Exactly?

Note: You can watch this teaching on CrossWalk’s YouTube channel.

     The backdrop of the Christmas story is despair.  The few hundred years before Jesus was born was considered to be a time when God was silent. No new words from God spoken through prophets were being announced or published.  The state of Israel suggested that God had left the building: foreign oppressors ruled over them in their own land, and their Temple was in ruins until a bit before Jesus was born.  Even then, the Jewish tradition was tolerated more than celebrated.  The recitation of psalms and prayers and sacrifices seemed to fall flat, words of exasperation falling on deaf ears.

     And yet it was a time when the desperation of people was rising to fever pitch.  Some thought that God would act like God again (think Moses and the Exodus) if the people themselves would just show some faith and follow a leader courageous enough to sound a rallying cry.  Many did rise, faith-claiming the role of messiah, the anointed one of God who would be God’s agent to bring about the restoration they hoped for.  One by one those wannabe messiahs met their death at the hands of Rome.

     There was unrest.  There was despair.  There was crying out to God.  There was silence.  Where was God?

     Part of the brilliance of the stories surrounding Jesus’ birth are the inclusion of God showing up in surprising ways.  An old, childless couple long past child-bearing years is told that they could expect a bun in the oven very soon, and they were to name the child John.  In good male fashion, Zechariah offered solid “mansplaining” to the angel Gabriel, suggesting that this would be impossible due to their old age, and also that the kid would be named Zechariah, Jr.. Gabriel then did to Zechariah what women everywhere across all time have longed to do: he hit the mute button on Zech.  Nine months of peace and quiet surely helped Elizabeth enjoy her pregnancy!  Everybody wondered if God was up to something with them, and their suspicions were realized when, after the baby was born, Elizabeth named him John (to the shock of all), only to have Zechariah confirm it (at which point the mute button was turned off).  God was not distant, inactive, or silent.  God showed up.

     The birth narrative of Jesus is also incredible.  Instead of a highly respected elderly couple unexpectedly becoming new parents, the story of Jesus’ beginning starts from the other end of the spectrum.  Mary and Joseph are dirt poor.  They are engaged – likely a marriage arranged for some time – but aren’t together yet until Joseph can provide for her.  That could take a while since Joseph is a carpenter – not a high paying job, not much respect.  Their engagement was legally binding even if they weren’t allowed to consummate the marriage.  This is where the scandal comes in.  Mary is visited by Gabriel and told that she is going to get pregnant via the Holy Spirit – that her coming pregnancy would be anointed by God somehow – and that the child she would bear would be the messiah of God.  She visits her relative Elizabeth – now six months pregnant – and Elizabeth confirms that Mary must be telling the truth since baby John did a lot of kicking as soon as Mary showed up.  Or was it the spicy tacos she just ate?  Of course, getting pregnant out of wedlock – and not from your fiancé – is generally not ideal and caused a lot of problems with Joseph, their families, and their neighbors.  Who would believe such a thing?  One thing Mary (and eventually Joseph) learned was that God was not distant, but near.  God was not silent but speaking.  God was not inactive, but deeply involved.

     The night of Jesus’ birth, another set of undervalued people received a heavenly birth announcement.  Sometime later, astrologers from a distant land noticed a star that communicated to them that a new king was born and made the very long journey to pay homage.  The graveyard-shift shepherds under the stars that night found out that God was very much present – and with a massive heavenly host that could sing harmony – and that this God valued them despite their lowly state.  The astronomers discovered that God spanned vast distances of geography and was also willing to speak another religious language to communicate to them.  Not long after Jesus was born, more stories all along the same theme emerge – God is with us, right here, right now.

     If you have ever been in a place of despair, certain that God is not present, this comes as very comforting news.  Or not.  After all, God showed up for these few people while who knows how many people were still in the dark where all the anxiety gets stoked.  Perhaps there is more we need to consider.

     From what we have learned from the writings of antiquity around the time Jesus was born, the dominant theological framework revolved around theism, where God (or the gods) ruled the earth “down here” from the heavens “up there.”  There were certainly variations and nuances and different interpretations about what this all meant, but most people looked at the world through this faith lens.  The Jewish people believed God was very powerful, yet apparently not always willing to lend a hand.  Most of the time, when there was hardship, the assumption was that humanity had done something to offend God, explaining God’s lack of concern, which had to be appeased before God would act.  Lots of animals and a few people were sacrificed to that end.  Sound a little silly?  Yep.  Primitive, even? Yes.  And yet many people still hold the same view today even if we don’t think about sacrificing sheep or cows or people anymore.  Perhaps there is another way to think about God that makes more sense...

     The opposite of theism (where God is separate from creation) is pantheism (where everything is God).  In this view, I’m God, the trees are God, the rocks are God, the mailbox, the dog poop, the squirrels, everything (except cats – there’s no way cats are gods even though they act like they are).  Some folks resonate with this, but it tends to dilute God so much that God becomes so commonplace as to become irrelevant.  The Jewish and Christian scriptures, by the way, reject the notion of pantheism.  

     Another view that has been around forever and has been enjoying a rebound of sort for the last hundred years or so is panentheism, which literally translates “everything in God” and, by extension, God is in everything.  God, the animator, energizer, lover, restorer, renewer, redeemer, etc., is present all the time, everywhere, at work in everything.  God is never distant – and cannot be – because God is in everything.  God cannot be silent or inactive or unredeeming or unloving or uncreative or unrestoring or... because God remains God in everything. If this is true, it means that when we experience periods when God seems silent or distant, it may have more to do with our awareness, perspective, and perception than anything else.  Surely this was not entirely lost on people of antiquity.  There are too many experiences that are shared by humanity that support this idea even if we don’t know how to express it.  The feeling of joy and hope and love at the sight of a newborn child or animal.  The wonder of Spring, the fullness of Summer, the shift of Fall and the dead of Winter. Love.  Joy.  The majesty of creation.  Friendship. Solidarity.  The peace and calm that accompanies deep meditation and contemplation.  There are just so many instances and experiences where, upon reflection, we might say to ourselves, “I think there is more going on here than flesh and blood” (not to minimize flesh and blood which are also incredible examples of God’s presence). 

     Part of our hesitancy to embrace such an idea is that the dominant way of thinking remains stuck in theism, where we humans are not good and creation itself is doomed for destruction because it isn’t good, either.  Yet this runs counter to the very first utterances in our scared text, where everything is good and even very good, with God speaking it all into being.  The concept of the fall of man – which was not the original interpretation of the Adam, Eve, and Apple story – went too far, building on Paul’s work for a different purpose and becoming its own monster, giving license for people in power to wield it over those below them.  Theism needs to go.  It doesn’t reflect God well and does little to help us move forward into greater maturity.

     Next week we will look at Jesus and consider how he actually lived more from a panentheistic framework than a theistic one.  For now, take some time and wonder how it might be true that the presence of God is all around you and even in you.  God is neither distant nor silent.  Can you sense God?  Can you hear God?  Maybe we are all like Elijah, assuming God will show up only in the limited places we are looking.  Maybe we are all like the characters in the birth narrative of Jesus – feeling like we’ve been left behind only to discover that God is fully with us all the time if we’ll learn to have eyes to see.

In the live teaching I again featured Dr. Andrew M. Davis. Check out his book of spiritual memoirs from some well-known voices, How I Found God in Everyone and Everywhere - it will inspire!

God With Us: Let the Adventure Continue

Note: You can watch this teaching on CrossWalk’s YouTube channel.

How many Christmases have you lived through?  How has the meaning of Christmas changed for you over the course of your life? As we enter into another season of Advent (the waiting and anticipating of the birth of Jesus), what does it mean to you?

     Sometimes we get locked into a particular way of thinking about things.  That’s not a bad thing.  We need to know where our firm places are to stand.  When we land on what feels like good footing, we feel stable, confident, and able to build.  The problem sometimes comes when we don’t allow ourselves to wonder if there are other footings that may help us build in other ways.  Building on images of God for our spirituality and theology is wonderfully human and good.  This is called the kataphatic tradition.  Sometimes we get so limited by the images of God that we come to realize that no image is adequate, and we resort to not welcoming any images since they will be immediately limiting.  This is called the apophatic tradition.  These two traditions work together, of course, since they are opposites of one another. 

     The question is, how are you employing each tradition this Christmas season?  What images add to the richness of this time?  What images have you chosen to not employ as much?  How has the apophatic side allowed you to embrace more mystery in this season?

     Before we jump into the full Christmas story, I think it wise to spend some time determining where we’re “at”.  I know for fact that we are much less able to learn anything new until we identify what we know.  I hope this season will be wonderfully stretchy for you, which is a deeply embedded yet often neglected aspect of our faith tradition.  There is more to learn, more to imagine, more to write – this is a key part of the biblical tradition. The biblical narrative which includes the formation of the Jewish people all the way through Jesus and the early days of the church gives witness to the evolution of thought over many centuries.  The collective people of faith are still evolving.  Are you? Are we?

     Let the Advent-ure continue...

2021 Thanksgiving

Note: You can watch this teaching on CrossWalk’s YouTube channel.

This Thanksgiving, I offer three resources for you that I hope will help you experience a deeper, more reflective, and theologically rich time of gratitude.  Reading one or both of the writings below might be a great addition to include during your dinner.  And I hope this video featuring scholar and writer Diana Butler Bass will help you rethink what gratitude is really all about for you this season. Or, if you’re coming unglued, maybe this video will help. – Pete

 

A Brief Theology of Thanksgiving

The SALTProject.org Team 

I. Origins

     With apologies to the Pilgrims, the origins of the Thanksgiving holiday in the United States are more complicated than most people think. Was the first Thanksgiving meal in present-day Massachusetts, complete with buckled, wide-brimmed hats, in 1621? Or was it an English celebration (different hats!) on the shores of Virginia, in 1619? Or how about a Spanish gathering in what became Texas, in 1598 — or Florida, in 1565?

     The reasons for those celebrations varied, of course. The English colonists in Virginia, for example, declared the day a commemoration of their arrival, thanking God for safe passage across a forbidding ocean; likewise, the Spanish explorers thanked God for survival. On the other hand, after a 1637 massacre of Native Americans, the governor of Plymouth wrote that Thanksgiving Days would be “in honor of the bloody victory.” In 1789, President George Washington declared a national Day of Thanksgiving to thank God for the birth of a new nation. And the current annual date in late November — which is far too late, after all, for a “harvest festival” in New England! — wasn’t established until Abraham Lincoln’s declaration in 1863, explicitly giving thanks for the Union’s military efforts in the Civil War.

II. Thanksgiving Today. 

     So the holiday we inherit is a complex, morally ambivalent amalgam of different kinds of gratitude: for good harvest, for safe passage, for colonial conquest, for military victory. All of which only sharpens the question, How will we celebrate Thanksgiving today?

Remembering this history of immigration and cross-cultural connection and conflict, we may give thanks for the dazzling diversity of this land, including and especially Native American communities. Giving thanks in this way, our gratitude can spur us to reach out and work together to create a more just and equitable world.

     Likewise, remembering the holiday’s links to war, we may give thanks for times of peace: in our hearts, homes, neighborhoods, and between nations. Remembering the holiday’s links to creation, we may give thanks for that nourishing abundance. Here, too, our gratitude can serve as inspiration to redouble our efforts to be genuine peacemakers, serve the hungry in our neighborhoods, and care for God’s good Earth, all creatures great and small.

III. The Difference Gratitude Makes

     But there’s perhaps no better day than Thanksgiving to reflect on the astounding power of gratitude itself — and accordingly, to commit ourselves to cultivating it more intentionally in the coming year.  

     If we think of “gratitude” primarily as a kind of duty to discharge (Now remember to write that thank-you note!), we’re missing the boat entirely, effectively reducing one of life’s wonders to mere good manners. On the contrary, gratitude is vital force in the world, a profoundly dignifying act that builds relationships, communities, and healthy human hearts.

The science on this subject is overwhelming: in study after study, gratitude has been shown to lead to stronger relationships, better sleep, lower blood pressure, fewer trips to the doctor, fewer depressive symptoms, more patience, and more perseverance, among other benefits (check out these study summaries here and here). In one particularly intriguing study, gratitude turns out to be a powerful antidote to the “Headwinds/Tailwinds Asymmetry,” our all-too-common tendency to focus on the obstacles in our lives (headwinds) and overlook blessings (tailwinds), an imbalance that over time leads to feeling aggrieved and resentful. In short, focusing on headwinds breeds bitterness; focusing on tailwinds breeds appreciation — and the act of thanksgiving helps call our attention to the winds at our backs.

IV. Becoming More Grateful

     OK, so gratitude is powerful — but how to make more of it in our lives? It turns out that some of the most effective tools for increasing gratitude are also some of the simplest and most familiar. First, the basic act of not just counting our blessings but also recording them in a form we can revisit later — say, in a journal or notebook — has been shown to significantly enhance feelings of thankfulness over time.  

     Second, another simple action has been shown to be even more effective: writing a letter of thanks to a friend, family member, acquaintance, or even a stranger. That’s right — thank-you notes can change your life! Indeed, we should reconceive the humble thank-you note not merely as a way to inform others about how grateful we are, but also as a way to help strengthen how grateful we are in the first place. 

     And a third practice isn’t only effective, it’s downright fun, even and especially in a time of pandemic: connecting with a friend once a week for coffee (or tea, or lunch - by phone, online, or on a physically-distanced walk), and intentionally devoting at least part of the conversation to sharing what we’re thankful for these days. When it comes to gratitude, just “saying it out loud” to someone we like and respect, not to mention hearing what they’re thankful for, is a powerful step toward noticing — and more deeply experiencing — the blessings in our lives.

V. A Graceful Life

     The power of these practices makes sense: one of our most precious treasures is our time-and-attention, and how we spend that treasure will directly determine the health of our hearts (“For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also” (Matthew 6:21)). Will we spend it all focusing on “headwinds,” thereby creating the perfect petri dish for growing resentments and narratives of grievance? Or will we spend it focusing on “tailwinds,” thereby nourishing the soil for growing joy and narratives of appreciation? Gratitude journals, thank-you notes, and thankful conversations are simple, powerful, effective tools for investing our time-and-attention wisely.

     And so is prayer. Viewed from this angle, prayer is a kind of spoken gratitude journal, an intimate thank-you note or thankful conversation with God. And so is worship. Properly practiced, worship is an elaborate exercise — a whole gymnasium! — for cultivating thanks and praise, and at its best, the result is a swirl of palpable tailwinds, amazement, and joy. And so is the Eucharist (from the Greek for “thanksgiving”), the Lord’s Supper, the Communion meal. Gathered around a table of bounty, remembering an old story, giving thanks to God for safe passage, for life, for peace, and for the strength to continue the pilgrimage anew.

In the end, then, we’re “pilgrims” after all. So start (or revisit) a gratitude journal. Try writing a simple thank-you note once a week. Connect with a friend for coffee and (thankful) conversation. Recommit to a practice of prayer. And let this year’s Thanksgiving be not just a day of gratitude, but a springboard into a new life of gratitude, that most human and humanizing of gestures, the most graceful of all social graces.

 

Thanksgiving from an Open and Relational Theological Perspective

By Tom Oord

The uncontrolling love view has positive implications for prayer at Thanksgiving. Thanking an uncontrolling God makes a lot of sense. Thanking a controlling God doesn’t.

     Each November, Americans gather to celebrate the Thanksgiving holiday. Words of thanks sometimes enter the public news or get expressed at civic gatherings too. 

     It’s natural to wonder, “What do people mean when they say, ‘Thank you, God?’”

No God

     Some people don’t believe in God. Many of them feel thankful, but their Thanksgiving language has no ultimate Referent. In their view, no Divine Being exists to which their gratitude ultimately points. Giving thanks may be their way to admit they’ve enjoyed goodness the past year. 

     Sometimes, these people say, “Thank you, God.” But their disbelief in a Being to whom they should be grateful makes this confusing.

All God

     Those who say God controls everything — let’s call their view, “All God” — ​express gratitude at Thanksgiving. They believe God directly or indirectly controls everything. 

     In their prayers, All God advocates say, “Thank you, God, for ____.” They can insert any event whatsoever. Such events might be supremely joyful or utterly horrific. The God who controls everything is responsible for every act of respect and rape, for peace and pain, for havens or holocausts. 

     Most All God prayers focus on what’s good. Reminding All God advocates their God causes evil can dampen their holiday spirit!

The Allowing God

     Others who pray reject the idea God causes evil. But they claim God allows it. 

     When these people give thanks, they try to sidestep the problems that come with saying God allows evil. They might blame free agents or natural forces. But they try to avoid asking why a God who can stop evil singlehandedly permits it. The God who can control others fails to prevent the dastardly deeds we endure.

     The Allowing God permitted the pandemic, the holocaust, and your sister’s rape.

     When those who say, “God allows evil” pray at Thanksgiving, they could insert any event into the “Thank you, God, for _____” sentence. The Allowing God gets ultimate credit and blame for causing or allowing all things.

The Uncontrolling God of Love

     Thanksgiving prayers make better sense in the uncontrolling love perspective. Advocates of this view thank God for always giving freedom, agency, or existence to creatures and creation. And God presents a spectrum of possibilities to each creature in each moment. In giving and presenting, the uncontrolling God never controls. 

     The uncontrolling God is the gracious source for all that’s good. This God actively loves moment by moment by providing, inspiring, empowering, and interacting with creation. 

     Genuine evil comes when creatures fail to respond well to God’s call to love. Or evil comes from natural accidents and free processes of reality. In the uncontrolling love of God view, God does not cause nor allow evil.

A Thanksgiving Prayer that Makes Sense

     In her Thanksgiving prayer, an advocate of the uncontrolling love view can say every good and perfect gift originates in God. An active but uncontrolling God is the source of goodness and blessing. And this God neither causes nor allows evil, as if God could singlehandedly produce or prevent it. 

     The good we enjoy involves creaturely responses to God’s gracious action too. The uncontrolling love view supports our urge to thank creatures at Thanksgiving. God is not the only factor, actor, or force for good. Creatures can cooperate with God’s good work. As I say in Open and Relational Theology, an amipotent — not omnipotent or impotent — God exerts the power of love.

     Most believers thank other people at Thanksgiving. They know creatures can join with God to do good. It’s right to thank God as the source of goodness and those who cooperate with God. 

     At Thanksgiving, it’s right to thank the Creator and the cook!

 Widely Indebted

     The more we realize how interrelated the universe is and how much God loves in an uncontrolling way, the more we understand how widely we are indebted. A Thanksgiving meal is possible because of God’s action, a chef or chefs, farmers, those who transport food, those who make the plates, tables, and homes we use when celebrating, plants, animals, and so many more. 

     God inspires goodness throughout all creation. We have many reasons to be thankful… and many actors to thank!

 Thanksgiving Prayer. 

     In light of this, here’s a thanksgiving prayer that aligns with the view that God always loves in uncontrolling ways…

“We thank you, our loving God, for being the source of all that’s good.

You also empower and inspire the good we receive from others.

We’re thankful to humans and nonhumans for cooperating with your love.

We’re grateful people because you’re a good and loving God!”

 

Sexuality and the Immodesty of Love

In this session from An Interesting Conference on Sexuality hosted by Jonathon Foster along with Tom Oord, we hear from Elaine Padilla, an author and a professor of Philosophy and Religion, Latinx/Latin American Studies at LaVerne University. She's super interesting and I love what she talks about in her video. I will not soon forget the phrase she uses here, "the immodesty of love." Find some of Elaine's scholarly work at researchgate.net/profile/Elaine-Padilla.

unBlinding

Note: You can watch this teaching on CrossWalk’s YouTube channel.

When blindness strikes someone after they once had sight, they forget what they once saw.  The images once stored leave their memory.  Everything fades to black. Physically, the brain forgets how to see as well.  If sight is ever regained after being lost for a long time, it takes a very long time – years – for the brain to relearn how to see.

     Blind Bartimaeus got two miracles that day when he encountered Jesus.  His vision was restored – his eyes worked again – and his brain immediately was able to meaningfully process the information it was receiving. Something that should have taken a long time took just a moment.

     Jesus struggled with blindness.  We are not completely certain how long the process of regaining his sight took, but we can imagine that it took years – the long period of time leading up to his public ministry and beyond. We don’t have any reason to believe that his physical eyesight had ever been lost, but I am confident that he was very aware of the cultural blinders that he very naturally acquired as a man born into the context in which he lived.  This sort of blindness is very much related to the blindness we struggle with in our own time. It is a coming to awareness that our lenses have been very much affected by influences beyond our control and choice to see the world and everything in it in a particular way.  While we sometimes have moments when it feels like the veil has been removed, we later discover that it was just one veil of many that has impacted our ability to see clearly.

     As we’ve noted before, the crowd in the story likely acted just like crowds do today with those who are blind.  They treated the blind as if they were dumb.  They communicated in different ways that those who were blind were a burden on society, which shamed them.  And they communicated to those who were blind that surely their affliction was an indication of God’s wrath for something they did.  Note: similar attitudes and behaviors were held toward people who struggle with other afflictions: leprosy, paralysis, Gentile heritage, being female, being gender binary, being poor, as well as some afflictions of choice such as occupation (prostitutes and tax collectors come to mind). Overall, the culture Jesus was born into viewed all these people as “less than”.  To varying degrees, the “less than” attitude served to dehumanize these others, which then allowed the culture to treat them as less than equal human beings.  Their cultural lens shaped their vision to perpetually treat the “other” inhumanely.

     Jesus ventured into non-Jewish territory a little, but mostly he lived his life around the region of the Sea of Galilee, which was not the center of the Jewish or Roman universe.  He spent most of his time with Jewish people who thought just like the folks of Jericho.  We know that Jesus was able to recognize his cultural blindness because of what he did, what he taught, and the feedback he received.  He was considered radical because he treated the “others” as human beings instead of the labels the culture placed on them.  He didn’t simply publish books or articles or podcasts or YouTube videos or TED Talks about it – he actually lived according to his new way of seeing, with less and less of the cultural blinders that restricted him.  He took a lot of heat at times.  He was schooled by a non-Jewish woman asking for help for her daughter – can you imagine Jesus’ blinders being called out by a foreign woman, and he accepted it?!  Remarkable!  Religious leaders and the general public were stunned by his choosing to be with – up close and personal – all the “others” who had been dehumanized by the majority.  He treated them as human beings. There was a first time for all of these gracious moves closer to those who had been ostracized.  Especially the first few times, it had to be tough to swim upstream, to go against the crowd, to choose to see differently than everybody else around him.

     Jesus did this very thing when he stopped in his tracks, against the flow of the crowd, and treated Bartimaeus with humanizing dignity and compassion. Nobody else did.  Certainly not the crowd.  Apparently not the local religious leaders.  Not even his disciples who had journeyed with him so closely.  Not even Jesus’ disciples!  They were still learning to see and live by what they saw.  What strength and courage it must have taken Jesus to take a humane stand when everyone else just kept moving forward.  All the way to the end of his life, Jesus chose to take a stand for grace, dignity, compassion, love, all because he began to see differently and live by what he saw.

     Bartimaeus received his sight, and he chose to follow Jesus, to risk living on what he was seeing.  This is similar to the healing of a blind man in Jerusalem according to the Gospel of John. He is credited with the brilliant statement of faith, I once was blind, but now I see.  His new sight and insight led him to stand up against the inhumane bullies that treated him like he was dumb, a burden, and cursed.  When he chose to stand, he found himself alone, rejected by the leaders of the crowd. He was alone, until Jesus found him and invited him into his company.

     In the Christian tradition for the majority of Church history we have been told what it means to be a Christian based on easily identifiable scriptures – mostly from New Testament writings apart from the four Gospels.  The letters – mostly from Paul – were written to churches or regions to help people with their theology.  The new religion was a religion about Jesus. But this is not the same as the religion of Jesus – what Jesus believed and practiced.  According to highly respected Christian ethicist David Gushee, Christians have largely missed the core meaning of what it means to actually live like Jesus because so much emphasis has been placed on what to believe about Jesus. Read an excerpt from his book below, or go directly to the article from which the content below was taken.

 

     I have written a new book called After Evangelicalism. I claim that white American “evangelical” Christianity is fatally flawed, and probably has been from the beginning of its modern incarnation in the 1940s. It certainly has become a carrier of theological and moral beliefs and practices that fall far short of the way of Jesus, that deeply harm specific groups of people, and that are driving many away from faith. My book both attempts to diagnose what has gone wrong and to propose better ways forward for a post-evangelical Christianity.

     In thinking through these issues, I make my way to the question of Jesus. I explore who Jesus is for white American evangelical Christians, in contrast with who he is in Scripture itself.

     I suggest that white evangelical Christianity has produced four flawed versions of Jesus. Which version is presented in various churches depends a lot on who the preacher is and how local traditions develop; and undoubtedly sometimes multiple versions of Jesus are presented in one church.

     Here is my list of pseudo-Jesuses:

     Jesus the Crucified Savior. The primary function of this Jesus is to come into this dark world to die on the cross so that we believers might be forgiven our sins and go to heaven when we die.

     This was the primary version of Jesus I was first exposed to in Southern Baptist Christianity. Jesus loves you and died on the cross for your sins. This Jesus can easily be rooted in the New Testament, although not mainly in the synoptic Gospels. Paul’s writings are a central source of this vision of Jesus, as is John’s Gospel.

     This is a defensible Jesus, in New Testament terms. But there is a lot missed with this version of Jesus. Specifically, this Jesus has no necessary moral content. He doesn’t really ask anything of believers other than belief. He doesn’t really care about anything other than eternal salvation. This Jesus can produce churches filled with people who believe they are saved but have no particular idea about whether Jesus has anything to say about how we live now. This means we will need to look elsewhere for guidelines for personal and social morality. “Elsewhere” is dangerous territory.

     Hallmark Christmas Movie Jesus. This is the kind, attentive, ruggedly handsome guy we sing about sometimes. This is the Jesus whom we ask to “hold me,” one who is there “when I am weak and he is strong,” and “when I am down, he lifts me up.” This Jesus is the best (platonic) boyfriend or bro-friend I could possibly have, the one who is there for me all the time, my comfort and encourager. He also runs a really nice Christmas-related operation, so that’s a plus. (This is a joke about Hallmark Christmas movies, which always feature a lonely guy in a cute small town who runs something like a mistletoe shop or candy cane store and just needs a good wife.)

     This is a highly sentimentalized Jesus, whose main role is our emotional stabilization in a trying world. This is a Jesus who again doesn’t make moral demands. He doesn’t help me think about what faith requires in action. He just wants to comfort me and look good in flannel.

     Jesus Who Wants You to Succeed. This latest Jesus is a staple megachurch evangelical Jesus. In suburban evangelicalism, this is the Jesus who offers success principles for leadership and life to upwardly striving young professionals. In prosperity gospel land, this is the Jesus who wants you to be as wealthy, lovely and thin as the pretty leaders on stage.

     I see little contact between this Jesus and the New Testament. This is also not a Jesus who could help me understand why I can’t follow Hitler and Jesus at the same time.

     Vacant Jesus — Fillable with Any Content We Want. This Jesus, having been distanced so profoundly from his Jewish roots, his account of himself and any New Testament depictions, is a mere shell, symbol or totem. This is a Jesus always available to be filled with whatever content we might like to drop in there.

     The way you get to this Jesus is by systematically ignoring the Jesus one meets in the Gospels. Or, if he is not ignored, we find ways to evade what he said, to thin down his theological vision and moral demands as far as possible, to shave away anything that might make a claim on us.

     “Vacant Jesus is not just useless. He can be positively harmful.” This Vacant Jesus is not just useless. He can be positively harmful. This can be the Jesus of the KKK, the Race God Savior of My People Only, #MAGA Jesus or Football Jesus or Corporate Jesus or Straight White American Jesus. Vacant Jesus is always available to be the totem of my tribe, my class, my race, my party, providing ultimate religious justification for whatever I most strongly believe in.

     The most dangerous thing about Vacant Jesus is that we can deploy him to reverse the actual demands of the real Jesus.

 

Jesus according to Jesus

     For my book, I decided to see what New Testament scholars are right now saying about Jesus. I turned to a British scholar named James Dunn, a highly respected scholar who died just after I finished the book.

     In the last book Dunn ever wrote, which is called Jesus According to the New Testament, he acknowledges that the New Testament offers various pictures of Jesus — although none of them are Hallmark Jesus, Success Jesus or Vacant Jesus. He zeroes in on what he calls “Jesus according to Jesus” — the core depiction of Jesus himself as presented in the synoptic Gospels. This very core Jesus, the most basic Jesus, looked like this:

·       Jesus created and articulated the Love Command as the highest statement of moral obligation: love God with everything you have and love your neighbor as yourself.

·       Jesus placed priority on the poor. This was visible in his preaching, his parables and his actions.

·       Jesus offered welcome to sinners. He also taught that welcoming sinners is what God does. This drew criticism because it upset the expectations of those around him.

·       Jesus demonstrated openness to Gentiles. He taught that many will come from all directions to the messianic banquet, he ministered to many Gentiles, and he commissioned the disciples after his resurrection to go and make disciples of all nations.

·       Jesus included women among his close followers. He gave women a vital role in his ministry, including them among his band of followers, ministering to them just the same as to men, and appearing to them after his resurrection.

·       Jesus demonstrated openness and love to children. People brought sick kids to Jesus and he healed them. Jesus rejected the disciples’ efforts to shoo them aside. He elevated a certain kind of innocent childlikeness.

·       Jesus relaxed Jewish food laws and related regulations about purity. He emphasized inward rather than external cleanness.

·       Jesus instituted the Lord’s Supper. This unforgettable last meal with Jesus became an important part of the ritual life of the early church and provides a link between the ministry of Jesus, his death and the practice of his followers.

·       Jesus proclaimed the kingdom of God, which he understood as already evident in his ministry but also with a grand consummation lying ahead. He offered powerful, authoritative teaching and was notable for his striking parables.

·       Jesus healed and exorcised demons through the power of the Holy Spirit.

·       Jesus understood himself as commissioned by God for ministry, sent by God his loving Father, anointed by the Spirit, coming as messiah of Israel.

·       Jesus understood that, contrary to common expectation, his messiahship meant suffering, rejection and death rather than triumph. He expected to die in Jerusalem, and he did.

Take a second and consider this list against the background of the four evangelical Jesuses I started with. Might you join me in finding it a little troubling that there are few points of contact between any of those evangelical Jesuses and the accounts of Jesus that we have just reviewed?

     To drive the above home even further, I close with the following article by William Willimon. Don’t have nine minutes to read it?  Here is the gist: if you want to follow the real Jesus, expect a bumpy, adventurous ride where you are stretched in ways you did not know you needed to grow, where you get to learn to live the way Jesus lived, and also where you will most certainly experience the same kinds of pushback as Jesus did as well.  This Way, Truth, and Life is where the Spirit of God thrives and the world becomes a bit more like it was intended, and the people in it are able to live into their True Selves in all of their made-in-the-image-of-God glory.  Awesome.  Difficult.  Unblinded.  Let’s go.

 

Repentance, Conversion, and Faith: Jesus transforms, jolts, and disorders for the better every life he touches. By William H. Willimon

 

Repentance: Wising up. Turning to the God who, in Christ, has turned to you – to change your heart and life.

     Metanoia (Greek for repentance) is cousin of metamorphosis. When John the Baptist prepared the way for Christ, he told the crowds to hear the good news, get washed up, be drowned, give away surplus clothing, practice justice, in short, “Repent!”

     Although Jesus discourages us from showing off our goodness, he commends public admission (confession) of badness. Critics attempted to trap Jesus in a discussion of tragedy by asking, “Hear about the tower that fell and killed those people in Siloam [natural evil] or the Galileans whom Herod executed [human evil]? What did they do to deserve that?”

     Jesus responded with a non sequitur: “Unless you change your hearts and lives, you will die just as they did.” If we can’t repent of our temptation to keep God at a distance with our detached theological discussions of others’ pain and injustice (and maybe even our books on Christian vocabulary), we’ll never know much about God.

     Repentance is turning and facing in a different direction whereby we are enabled to see. Until we stand under the gospel, we can’t understand it. Faith is best known from the inside looking out. Salvation is free and very costly. Jesus transforms, jolts, and disorders for the better every life he touches. When God turns toward you, and you turn toward God, your life turns around.

Conversion: Detoxification. The God whom we wanted on our terms, taking us on God’s terms.

     Crabby Tertullian said, “Christians are made, not born.” Christians come from the church’s baptismal font, not people’s loins. Because Jesus and his kingdom fundamentally challenge everything we thought we knew for sure, conversion is part of the project. Paul didn’t know whether to describe what happened to him, when he met Christ, as birth or death. It felt like both at the same time.

     Christian is not synonymous with being born American. Conversion is mandatory. Rarely is the Christian life an orderly progression toward God. More typically, it’s a series of jerks and jolts, lurches to the left or right. Fasten your seat belts, you could end up miles from here.

Nobody ever gets so adept at being a Christian that you lose your amateur status. Seldom a one-and-done experience, as Christ told old Nicodemus, “You must be born again,” to which Wesleyans add, and again, and again, and probably again. Birth to death, darkness to light then, at the end, death leading to life.

     Warning: I’m not saying that the Holy Spirit takes advantage of us when we’re down, but if you are going through a particularly painful time in your life, know that Christ enjoys showing up at such moments and working them to his gain. On the other hand, if you are happy with the life you are living, pleased as punch with the person you are, happy with the world as it is, be careful hanging around Jesus. He may take you just as you are but never leaves you there. Everyone he touches, Christ transforms.

     Extreme makeover, like our salvation, is something that God does to you rather than something you do for yourself. Baptism is not a declaration that you’ve at last found a faith that works for you but rather your bodacious willingness to let this faith work on you. Christ’s baptismal promises: you are not doomed to plod along in the life your parents handed you. By the power of the Holy Spirit, anybody can be a saint, everyone can have fate transformed into destiny by God. You, even you, can hit the road with Jesus. “Come die with me,” he says, “that you might rise to the life I wanted to give you in the first place.”

     As Jesus headed down the road one day a man comes up and asks him a deep theological question: “What must I do to inherit eternal life?” One Gospel says that the man was a “ruler,” another that he was “young.” All agree that he was rich. Jesus brushes him off by telling him to obey all the commandments. Turns out this man is really good at being good; he’s been totally obedient since he was a kid, a hard-core success, both materially and spiritually. Then Jesus speaks those converting words that Christians like me have always wished he hadn’t: “Go … sell … give … follow me.”

     If you journey with Jesus, expect a rough ride.

Faith: Acknowledgement that what scripture says is happening, actually is. Willingness to be whom God has created us to be; readiness to be transformed and transfigured by someone who works beyond, beneath, and above things as they seem to our senses. More a welcoming wave than a stiff salute, when Christ turns to us. Paying attention. Overcome by light. Enraptured.

     Faith happens when reality, first experienced as mundane and speechless, overflows, so that we hear something and exclaim, “I believe.” Better than some innate human yearning, faith is our reasonable response to an occurrence that has happened to us, named Jesus Christ. More than intellectual assent, the Christian faith is about walking with Christ even when you aren’t sure where he’s taking you. Being faithful more than having faith.

     Faith arises when we begin to trust Jesus more than ourselves. Most of us come to trust the God that Christianity talks about before we sign up for the whole system. Once you take that first trusting step toward the God who turns to you, Christian teaching, beliefs, and behavior begin to make sense.

     Paul didn’t know whether to describe what happened to him, when he met Christ, as birth or death. It felt like both at the same time.

     Jesus asked a man born blind, whom he has just healed, whether or not he “believes” in the Human One (or Son of Man). Jesus isn’t asking the man if he thinks that Jesus exists – Jesus stands in front of him. Jesus is asking if the healed person is ready to trust the one he is staring at. The man responds simply, “I believe.” When a gang of religious scholars gives the man hell for saying he believes in Jesus, the man replies, “Don’t know much ‘bout theology. All I know was I once was blind but now I see.” This dynamic – believing before all the evidence is in – occurs in the souls of millions.

     We are saved “through faith,” which sounds to us pragmatic, mother-I’d-rather-do-it-myself Americans like another assignment for self-betterment. No, faith is a gift. Not what we should, ought, must but rather God’s having done, finished, given. If we can say, “I trust Christ,” it’s a sure sign that God has made good on God’s electing promise: I will be your God; you will be my people.

     Paul says that Abraham (who wasn’t a Christian) is the prime exemplar of faith. Old Abram saddling up the camels, his geriatric wife pregnant, heading out on the basis of a cockeyed promise from a God he had only recently, briefly met. Abraham and Sarah are about as good examples of faith as we’ve got.

     However, Jesus repeatedly rebukes his disciples for their lack of faith, little faith, slow faith, and inability to believe what prophets said about him. Fortunately, we don’t need much of it; faith the size of a mustard seed will do. Bring on those mountains.

     “Faith” categorized as a generic human tendency is insipid. Everything depends on what you have faith in. The bland expressions “people of faith” or “faith community” presume that all faiths are the same and that there are people who have “faith” and people who don’t. When someone says, “I don’t have faith in Christ,” it means, not that they are faithless but rather that they have put their faith in someone other than a Jew from Nazareth who lived briefly, died violently, and rose unexpectedly. When free-floating “faith” becomes “faith in Christ,” that’s when our lackluster little lives become adventurous and talk of “faith” becomes interesting.

     Have trouble trusting that Christ is the truth about God? Be patient. Faith comes to you rather than you to it. The God whom you have difficulty turning toward has promised to turn toward you. Besides, who wants a God who is no more than the one you chose?

Sexuality and Outcasts

Note: You can watch this teaching on CrossWalk’s YouTube channel.

In this session from An Interesting Conference on Sexuality hosted by Jonathon Foster along with Tom Oord, we will hear from James Alison, a Catholic theologian, priest and author, and one of the foremost Girardians (Rene Girard) in the world. James shares his thoughts here about how Jesus chose to occupy the place of those who've been cast out. The thought should not have been lost on us that it's the LGTBQ+ crowd who have been cast out by so many over the years. Find out more about James at jamesalison.com

Blinders

Note: You can watch this teaching on CrossWalk’s YouTube channel.

This is week three of a four-week series based on the following account from Mark 10:46-52 (NRSV):

     They came to Jericho. As he and his disciples and a large crowd were leaving Jericho, Bartimaeus son of Timaeus, a blind beggar, was sitting by the roadside. When he heard that it was Jesus of Nazareth, he began to shout out and say, “Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me!” Many sternly ordered him to be quiet, but he cried out even more loudly, “Son of David, have mercy on me!” Jesus stood still and said, “Call him here.” And they called the blind man, saying to him, “Take heart; get up, he is calling you.” So, throwing off his cloak, he sprang up and came to Jesus. Then Jesus said to him, “What do you want me to do for you?” The blind man said to him, “My teacher, let me see again.” Jesus said to him, “Go; your faith has made you well.” Immediately he regained his sight and followed him on the way.

     The way the crowd reacted when Bart cried out is jarring to me.  In fairness, I could be letting my imagination run away with me.  Maybe they shushed Bart in the most loving of ways that made him feel like he just got a nice warm hug.  But I doubt it.  The reason I doubt it is because in my experience of being a human being, groups like this can get rude and inhumane, focusing on the wrong thing and acting in ways as a group that they probably wouldn’t if they were alone.  This phenomenon is called groupthink.  When it gets ugly, we call it mob mentality.  The gist is the same – people in a group are influenced by the group itself, wanting to conform and remain accepted by the group, and will do things they don’t understand or believe in as individuals to remain in good standing.  Checking out this fascinating video of an experiment in a waiting room.  Check out this video for a fuller examination of groupthink, how it works, and its dangerous potential.

     Bart chose not to conform to social norms that day when he broke his silence as Jesus walked by.  His crying out for help was bigger than his vision issue.  There was something terribly wrong beyond his inability to see.  Bart himself didn’t fit the group.  He was very likely not welcome in the group, treated poorly by the group, made to feel stupid by the group, and told he was cursed by God from the group.  There are a lot of Barts in the world, and when they cry out, they get shushed.  My guess is that every time a person chooses to buck the system and cry out – an indicator that the group has neglected to listen to and include their perspective or person – the group reacts aggressively.  This happens in family systems when somebody calls out a patriarch or matriarch for whatever behavior they may have been perpetuating that may not promote the best for everyone anymore.  This is painfully evident when a family system supports a family member’s addiction or refusal to address their mental health struggle.  Mess with the system and there will be hell to pay.  In Family Systems Theory, problems sometimes rise and are seen not with the addict, but with someone in the system who, like Bart, starts acting up (usually unwittingly).  This Identified Patient isn’t the real problem, but rather a symptom of a larger issue at work in families.  The interesting thing is that sometimes the family members will protect the unhealthy system because they know that things will get miserable if the status quo is challenged.

     Of course, this happens on the largest of scales as well.  Our ancestors who settled what we now call the United States were at least informed by the Christian faith if not motivated to come to our shores due to their deep religious convictions.  And yet they were responsible for the eradication of the Indigenous Peoples who had lived here for thousands of years.  I know that some say that this is just the way it is all over the world, which is accurate.  But the Kingdom of God that Jesus came to announce and usher in doesn’t operate the way the rest of the world does.  The Kingdom of God also does not encourage the buying and selling and abusing other human beings, yet we took it to a whole new level in the US.  Not surprisingly, when both issues were challenged – even within religious communities – it was met with fierce resistance.  Some advocates of change were deemed heretics.  After all, the argument went, the Bible does not explicitly forbid owning other human beings as slaves, so can you really condemn it? Of course, we’re not the only country guilty of such groupthink mentality.  Canada made similar offenses against Indigenous Peoples that are horrific as well. Sensible individual Germans, when the power of groupthink came into play, became a machine for the death of millions of Jewish people.  Every culture likely has a similar history of destruction related to groupthink.

     The reality isn’t just in our past, however, it is extremely and painfully current.  Wonder what they might be?  You don’t have to work too hard.  Most headlines that deal with anything remotely political will signal where groupthink is at play.  Economic policy, foreign policy, immigration policy, environmental policy, civil rights policies, education, health – it is a long list.  With the dawn of new communication platforms offered by social media and the prevalence of smartphones, groupthink has become more powerful and perhaps more sophisticated than ever before.  Watch Netflix’s The Social Dilemma if you’re wondering just how sophisticated things have become.

     My goal isn’t to push buttons that have already been pushed.  We are at a time of increased sensitivity (to say the least). The dynamics are not new even though the names of characters might be.  What we are living in is what human beings have lived in from the very beginning.  The dynamic will be with us forever.  Barts of many kinds will continue to cry out.  The question is, how will we choose to respond?

     It is annoying and uncomfortable when people challenge the system(s) in which we feel at home.  It’s easy to blow off Bart.  But what if it’s Jesus who is the one crying out?  What if the Spirit of God working through Jesus was actually an echo of Bart, saying the very same thing? “God, have mercy, now!”

     I believe this is the case.  Jesus didn’t come to build a new level on top of the foundation of what was in place.  He came to tear it down and rebuild it.  The foundation was fine, but the structure got wonky, like the builders forgot to bring a square, a level, and a plumb bob.  The Kingdom of God was and is a different operating system than what the world prefers.  Jesus came to shine a light on both: he called out systems that were not aligned with the Spirit of God and he taught about what the Spirit of God was trying to do in the world.  He had the audacity to call it Good News, which he stole from Rome.  Jesus was saying that the Good News of God was better than the Good News of the Roman Empire.  In challenging the restrictions of the Jewish leadership, Jesus was also saying that the salvation offered by God was bigger, more expansive, and more inclusive than the salvation peddled by the Temple leadership.  The Spirit of God is still making those same declarations.  The dream of God for humanity is bigger than the American Dream.  The experience of becoming whole and well is deeper than is offered by popular religion in America.  Do we have ears to hear?  Do we sense a craving to know more?

     Next week I will address what that journey looks like if we choose to listen, see, and follow. But for now, be humbled by the fact that the healer, Jesus, who stopped and addressed Bart, which was an act of disruption, marched on to Jerusalem where all his system-bucking came to a climax.  Groupthink came into play once again and resulted in the death of one of the purest, loveliest, most grace-filled human beings that ever lived.  Groupthink has the capacity to do that.  We are capable of horrific atrocities – all of us – especially when we are encouraged by a group.  We likely have already been part of some horrible stuff that is directly counter to the Kingdom of God and haven’t even recognized it because our group has done its job.  If you’re feeling a bit defensive right now, you just proved my point.

     The homework I encourage for all of us is to regularly examine all the groups with which we affiliate, knowing that they all have their groupthink effect on us.  We are human, after all. Might there be a part of us that wonders how the Kingdom of God, the Good News, might challenge our systems?

Sexuality and Process Theology in Action

The following is the audio from a session of An Interesting Conference on Sexuality hosted by Jonathon Foster along with Tom Oord. we have a wonderful presentation from Monica Coleman. Monica is a process theologian, author, and someone who speaks around the world on all kinds of topics. She brings to light the interrelatedness of all things, the importance of communication, consent, and power in all things sexuality related. When you check into Monica's work by going to monicaacoleman.com, you'll find she speaks on many of the issues that religious leaders usually avoid: sexual and domestic violence, mental health, postmodernism, and religious diversity. Monica is a great gift to us all!

Sexuality and the Purity Culture

This is the audio from An Interesting Conference about Sexuality hosted by Jonathon Foster along with Tom Oord. This episode features Linda Kay Klein (who is interviewed by her husband, Jimmy). Linda is something of a trailblazer. She's the best selling author of Pure: Inside the Evangelical Movement That Shamed a Generation of Young Women and How I Broke Free. She has a lot of wisdom to offer and among other things in this video, I think she gives women permission to be themselves, to begin to define sexuality on their own terms, and to name the dis-health of the evangelical purity culture. Yes, it's challenging, but that's not to say that staying with the "tenants" of the purity culture isn't messy either! Linda has spoken around the world from the TEDx stage to The Apollo’s Women of the World Festival. Her work has been featured by the New York Times, NPR, CBS, NBC, Elle Magazine, and 150 other outlets. Learn more at lindakayklein.com

Blind: Labels

     Rosemary Mahoney spent time at a school for the blind in Tibet.  She discovered that three general things happen to the blind across the globe.  First, they are deemed stupid by the culture around them.  Second, they are considered cursed by God.  Third, in different ways, they are made to feel like a burden on society.  In her research on persons who were born or became blind, she notes that while there may be an initial despair for what has happened, they move forward to learn how to live in the world.  They don’t romanticize it – it is hard – yet they are not undone by it either.  In village after village, blind kids were treated like animals because it was assumed that they were dumb and unsafe to be left alone; they felt cursed, and they felt the weight of shame put on them by the culture around them.

     I wonder what motivated Bart more – the regain his sight for sight’s sake, or to regain his sight so that he no longer had to live under the burden of the voices all around him?  Surely, he was exhausted and beaten down by the constant barrage of words, tone, and behavioral response from the many around him.  Living in the world was tough enough for Bart.  Not having a choice regarding how he was treated by those around him was salt in his wound.  Perhaps his yearning to be free was a heart-cry stemming from his despair – not from being blind, but from the assault of the many around him.

     In literal blindness, when sight is lost, the brain begins to forget how to see.  So much so that, if a significant amount of time has passed, the brain has to relearn how to see, which takes a long time – a couple of years!  I wonder how long it takes for us to see our true selves after a long time of being formed to see ourselves by others’ definitions.  How have we, like Bart, been labeled?  How have we embraced, adopted, and believed that the labels we have been given are true?

     Labels related to age, height, weight, shape, education, economic status, employment, “looks”, mental health, physical health, sexuality, sexual identity, gender, skin tone, religiosity, ethnicity, criminality, immigration, political persuasion... how many labels are there? Labels limit, even labels that we choose to identify with, because when we choose to wrap our persona around a particular label, we make it difficult to live outside of the label.  Can Giants’ fans cheer for the A’s? Can Niners root for the Raiders?  Can country music fans like Coldplay?  Can a fan of high-end clothing or cars also don Old Navy and be content in a clunker? The answer is yes, of course, yet voices around us will sometimes make it challenging.

     Most of the time we don’t change much unless there is a truly compelling reason to do so.  Usually, our discontent has to be high enough to make it worth it.  We are not very proactive when it comes to major life change.  Change is hard enough in isolation.  Add the force of labels that we have chosen (as well as those that are placed on us) and a sort of prison emerges.  Getting out of that prison takes enormous energy.  Staying out does, too, because we will very naturally revert to the way things were.  Sometimes the promise of freedom seems elusive, only coming around now and them. 

     Bart’s level of pain was finally great enough, and the promise of freedom present enough in Jesus that he decided to act.  Last week I pointed out the urgency of his request, which can perhaps come off a little bit audacious, apparently demanding immediate attention from Jesus.  It was, which is why the crowd hushed him.  I wonder, however, if the urgency was for Bart as much as for Jesus, as if Bart was yelling out, “I can’t take it anymore! I am ready to be free of life as it is right now. I want to see; I want my blinders off!  Now!”

     The Good News Jesus proclaimed is all about that, and the invitation to a different way of life is central to experiencing the Good News.  For many people, the moment of crying for help and hearing that there is acceptance, forgiveness in some cases, and a new way is so powerful that it results in a feeling of being born again.  I have had this experience more than once.  It is euphoric.  Joy overflows.  Life is filled once again with promise.  Hope is restored. The initial moment is just the beginning, however.  It is important, but it really is the first step on the trail.

     Bart surely had such a moment, and then he saw another decision before him.  If he had hopes of a truly new life, he could see that it required learning a lot of new ways of being and doing in the world.  He recognized that he needed support – he was not going to be able to move forward in isolation. Did others help him realize this?  Probably.  We don’t know all that took place in those moments following the lifting of his blindness, but what we do know is that he chose to follow Jesus forward.  He realized that the Way of faith is different than the way he had previously travelled, and so he chose to follow the one who knew the way, with the support of others.

     The journey of faith is incapsulated in Bart’s story.  At different points in our lives, we come to see that we are ready for change, ready for something new.  Faith is not a one-and-done thing – it is a journey of discovery where we learn a new Way of living.  The invitation always comes from love, is always for our growing into the depths of love and is marked by love (sometimes tough love).  Most of the time we don’t even know where our blind spots are until we cannot ignore them anymore.  Sometimes we realize that we are in the doldrums and want to get out of them. Sometimes our lives blow up. Sometimes we get an epiphany of something new and different that we can’t look away from.  They all come to a point where we see the reality of our lives, the invitation to learn the unforced rhythms of grace, and decide to call out.  Bishop Michael Curry sums it well:

There is a Jewish proverb, “Before every person there marches an angel proclaiming, ‘Behold, the image of God.’” Unselfish, sacrificial living isn’t about ignoring or denying or destroying yourself. It’s about discovering your true self—the self that looks like God—and living life from that grounding. Many people are familiar with a part of Jesus’s summary of the law of Moses: You shall love your neighbor as you love yourself. Yourself. Loving the self is a required balance. If we fail in that, we fail our neighbor, too. To love your neighbor is to relate to them as someone made in the image of the God. And it is to relate to yourself as someone made in the image of the God. It’s God, up, down, and all around, and God is love.

– Love Is the Way: Holding on to Hope in Troubling Times

     Bart, what do you want God to do for you?  Are you ready to make your desire known?  Are you ready to add urgency to your request?  Are you ready to follow Jesus’ Way that leads to life, supported by others? Maybe for you it’s the first time you’ve seen the hope before you, or maybe it’s the umpteenth time.  The journey is filled with never-ending invitations to join the party on the Way.  Today the invitation is before you, Bart.  What’s your RSVP?

Blind: Overview

Note: You can watch this teaching on CrossWalk’s YouTube channel.

Mark 10:46-52 (NRSV)

     They came to Jericho. As he and his disciples and a large crowd were leaving Jericho, Bartimaeus son of Timaeus, a blind beggar, was sitting by the roadside. When he heard that it was Jesus of Nazareth, he began to shout out and say, “Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me!” Many sternly ordered him to be quiet, but he cried out even more loudly, “Son of David, have mercy on me!” Jesus stood still and said, “Call him here.” And they called the blind man, saying to him, “Take heart; get up, he is calling you.” So throwing off his cloak, he sprang up and came to Jesus. Then Jesus said to him, “What do you want me to do for you?” The blind man said to him, “My teacher, let me see again.” Jesus said to him, “Go; your faith has made you well.” Immediately he regained his sight and followed him on the way.

We’re going to hang out with these verses for a few weeks. There is just too much here to fit into one Sunday!

     Bartimaeus.  When we lose our sight, we don’t just lose our sight.  Our vision fades to black, but over time our memory does as well.  We struggle to remember the shapes of things, colors, textures.  Blindness is deeper than a literal vision problem – it affects how we see.  We don’t know when Tim and his wife’s son became blind – birth or some form of infection or accident – but we do know that the result went way beyond his physical condition.  When people today suffer a physical birth defect or mental health condition, really big questions often emerge: why did this happen?  Was God involved in this?  Did God willfully choose this, or allow it?  Or if it was an accident or virus of some sort, the same questions would come up.  Even today, with our much more enlightened scientific understanding, the questions loom, sometimes never articulated yet always there.  And even today we struggle with answering the question from a theological space – we often find ourselves more primitive in our thoughts than we’d care to admit.  Yet they are there.  In Jesus’ time, all of this was exponentially more pronounced. Either way, blindness was viewed as a curse from God, a punishment for sin on the part of the blinded one, or even his parents or grandparents.  Living in this reality is hard to appreciate fully.  For Tim and his wife, there surely had to be no shortage of shame that they had to endure.  Of course, for Bart, it was inescapable.  He was a living cautionary tale, a reminder that God’s wrath is ready to unload at any moment.  What does this do to a person’s sense of self?  How does it affect hope and resiliency? To be looked at and told – day after day – that your life is evidence of God’s uncaring – and yet you require the help of these sometimes-unwittingly-cruel people for your very survival. Unbearable.  Can you imagine the level of despair?  What did it require of him to even raise his voice to ask for help?  What courage to make it an urgent request?  What strength to yell loud enough to get over the crowd all the way to Jesus’ ears?  What risk to ask for such specific healing – he could have simply asked for a handout. 

     We’re going to take a deeper look at Bart and ourselves next week.  But for now, here are some questions to consider: What has been your “blindness” to endure which caused self-doubt, a crisis of faith, and perhaps was even made worse by cultural voices?  How did your “blindness” mess with your self-esteem and confidence?  How about your outlook on life?  Your hope?  Your view of God? Your view of how God relates to you? What is holding you back from voices your desire for healing to God? What levels of impact do you think Jesus’ healing had on Bart?

     Jericho Crowd.  The regular folks of Jericho were no doubt well acquainted with Bart and those like him who begged for their survival.  While Bart’s very existence suggests that they cared at least as much as necessary for his sustenance is hopeful – they didn’t kill their wounded.  Yet we get a sense from their recorded response that they were weary of the problems Bart represented.  What a burden he was on their fine community.  What a blight to our city’s entrance – can’t we move them to a dark corner near the city dump where nobody has to deal with them? Perhaps we could create a neighborhood just for them – not in anyone’s backyard, mind you, since that would ruin property values and certainly would drive up crime!  What a pain these people are!  God doesn’t even favor them – why should we?  Strange things happen when we let our thoughts run away from us, especially if those thoughts favor our preconceived biases.  This was not the first time that community members hushed Bart – I think we can be sure of that.  Undoubtedly, Bart felt their stares of indignation as much as he heard them. He knew his station in life.  Yet, he had heard enough about Jesus from those who traveled through as well as from Jesus’ prior visits that it would be worth a try.  How much worse could it get for him, anyway?  What did he have to lose?

     We’re going to go deeper on the blindness of the crowd in a couple of weeks.  But for now, what are your thoughts related to these questions? Who are the blind beggars in our midst who are always seemingly in need of help for survival, who are sort of taking up space, maybe even to the point of embarrassment? How do we witness cultural voices that dehumanize these folks by identifying them more by their label than their personhood?  Why do we humans do that? What impact do you think Jesus’ healing had on their vision?  How long do you think the healing stuck?

     Jesus, Christ.  Jesus and the disciples certainly must have hung out a few days in Jericho before heading to Jerusalem.  Maybe they wanted to hit the Dead Sea Spa for a salt scrub before the “Triumphal Entry”?  There are some deeper theological reasons why we see Jesus visiting Jericho before heading to Jerusalem that we will touch on another day.  Apparently, Bart never made it onto Jesus’ radar while he was visiting.  This was the last shot (truly).  Jesus, once he heard Bart call out, stopped in his tracks.  He was not indignant.  He simply asked for the blind man to be brought before him.  What a God truth is present here!  God is always available, always patient, always willing to hear us out.  And another: Jesus asked him what he wanted.  How true this is of God!  Thank God that God doesn’t order up everything there is about me that needs help!  I wouldn’t recognize myself!  Of course, God is most recognizably able to work with us in those spaces in which we welcome God to work.  Bart could have asked for food, or money, or a new iPhone.  Instead, he took the risk and asked for the whopper: I want to see.  This is bigger than a physical healing.  There is deep spiritual healing at work here, too.  Recall that blindness was closely associated with sin and judgment.  At Jesus’ word, the blindness was gone. And, as far as that immediate audience was concerned, so was the unforgiven sin and the judgment of God.  How many people had their eyes opened that day?  How many people experienced correction and were more able to see God? How many understood grace at a whole new level?  How many no longer associated such maladies as curses from God?

     The Disciples.  Jesus’ closest followers had a front row seat when this went down.  They no doubt saw the fearful humility on Bart’s face, the disdain in the eyes of the crowd, and the compassion pouring out of Jesus’ very being.  They saw Bart’s face turn to joy upon seeing (and seeing deeply).  They saw shock on the faces in the crowd.  They saw heaven on Jesus’ face as love entered the space.  They obviously remembered the story since we’re still talking about it. I bet they talked about it, too, especially when they were faced with similar situations.  They would remember that Jesus took time to be with people – especially those who were rarely afforded an audience.  They would remember the attitude of the crowd and the courage it required of Jesus to be the presence of God under such strain.  This story informed their story, and the story of God they were devoted to share.  They would see similar faces – both of those in great pain as well as those who inflicted great pain.  They would remember Jesus, and they would imitate him.  They imitated Jesus so well that the message stuck enough to take hold and grow in the most unlikely places.  They imitated Jesus so well that in the end, those in power treated them just like Jesus: most of them were martyred.  Their dedication made an enormous difference in the world of those they healed, the broader world in which they lived, and, as the story is remembered, our world as well.

     We will go deeper into what Jesus and the disciples did in a few weeks.  For now, how do you respond to the following questions? Are you a disciple of Jesus?  What might their example mean for current day disciples? Who are the Barts who need healing in our midst?  What should we expect as we call for all Barts to draw near? At CrossWalk, we have a saying: Go Be Jesus.  What might this mean for today’s individual disciples?  What might it mean for the CrossWalk community?

Shotgun, Cup, and Baptism

Note: You can watch this teaching on CrossWalk’s YouTube channel.

Mark 10:35–45 (NLT), James and John Request Positions of Honor

     Then James and John, the sons of Zebedee, came over and spoke to him. “Teacher,” they said, “we want you to do us a favor.”

     “What is your request?” he asked.

     They replied, “When you sit on your glorious throne, we want to sit in places of honor next to you, one on your right and the other on your left.”

     But Jesus said to them, “You don’t know what you are asking! Are you able to drink from the bitter cup of suffering I am about to drink? Are you able to be baptized with the baptism of suffering I must be baptized with?”

     “Oh yes,” they replied, “we are able!”

     Then Jesus told them, “You will indeed drink from my bitter cup and be baptized with my baptism of suffering. But I have no right to say who will sit on my right or my left. God has prepared those places for the ones he has chosen.”

     When the ten other disciples heard what James and John had asked, they were indignant. So Jesus called them together and said, “You know that the rulers in this world lord it over their people, and officials flaunt their authority over those under them. But among you it will be different. Whoever wants to be a leader among you must be your servant, and whoever wants to be first among you must be the slave of everyone else. For even the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve others and to give his life as a ransom for many.”

 

More than the other Gospels, Mark repeatedly shines a light on Jesus’ disciples as ones who just didn’t get it.  They seem to have a constant question mark over their heads and a deer in the headlight look in their eyes.  This week’s passage is an example of this phenomenon.

     Despite many opportunities to see and hear Jesus talking about how the Way of God is a reversal of the dominant ways of the world, they clearly showcase their struggle to understand that climbing the ladder and gaining power in ways the world employs is not how Jesus operated and is at cross-purposes with God.

     James and John thought that they were headed for Jerusalem where Jesus would eventually take the throne of power.  They wanted to claim their seat of honor before the other disciples, which would then, of course, grant them more power and honor than their friends.  This was more than calling shotgun on the way to the car before your siblings or friends thought of it.  Their ascent meant something significant to their brothers.

     The model of success that still rules the day is one whereby you ascend the ladder of success, gaining greater title and power and usually with it increased wealth and privilege.  Sometimes that rise honors all those lower on the ladder.  Much of the time it does not. James and John wanted exactly what the world shaped them to pursue.  It is easy to shake our finger at them and be a little embarrassed for them as well.

     I wonder when they hatched the plan.  How many sermons did they tune out, how many obvious signs of the counter-cultural Way did they miss as they dreamt of the day to come when they would get to rule over others (even if in a benevolent sort of way)? Were they at all aware that they were struggling?  Probably not.  Were the other disciples in the same struggle?  Of course.  Were they upset, then, that James and John simply called “shotgun” before they thought of it?  Maybe so, which is why Jesus had to set things straight. Again. 

The reality is that we are all human like James and John, having been shaped by the inescapable cultural forces in our place in time and space.The question is whether we are willing to notice those forces and wonder how they contrast with the invitation to be live the Way of Christ.The ways of the world lead to more of the same.The Way of Christ leads to life for all.Shalom.What everybody truly desires for life and the world.How are you managing the tension?

The Camel and the Needle

Note: You can watch this teaching on CrossWalk’s YouTube channel.

     When people think of high-pressure sales, there are a few scenarios that usually come to mind.  Time shares, cars, and vacuum cleaners.  Unfortunately, some pastors have pressured people into supporting churches financially.  A lot of pressure.  I know because I used to be one of those pastors.  This week’s text was a supporting text for the sales pitch.  Reluctant to give some of your money – or a lot of it – to the church?  You may be forfeiting the Kingdom of God, which some assume may be heaven itself.  How’s that for pressure? I’ve got a handful of ugly stories I could share.  Sorry!  But I have grown out of it.

     There is a whole lot of ugly in interpreting the text in this way (even though it feels like the very thing Jesus is shooting for).  Viewing the text as such supports manipulation, and it reinforces a paradigm that more aligns with the human condition than the nature of God.  The rich guy clearly had a transactional view of faith: we do our part and God does God’s part; we do the right things, and God will love us.  This is not the Good News Jesus taught. God does not love us based on our performance or behavior.  God loves everyone unconditionally, longs for people to flourish in their lives, and trusts that as people experience more and more of the love of God, loving behavior toward God, themselves, and others will follow.

     Does Jesus’ instruction include us?  Are we supposed to cash out and embrace communal living?  Good news!  No!  This direction was specific to this rich guy because it was obvious to Jesus that he had a bit of idolatry at work in his heart. Being rich in that day and age was problematic.  It almost certainly meant that he in some way neglected the wellbeing of others around him which, of course, would be to also neglect the call to love God and our neighbors as ourselves.  Regardless of what his lips were saying, he worshipped money.  The invitation to give full trust to God instead of his money seems extreme to us, but perhaps we should appreciate that Jesus was calling this guy’s bluff and correct bad theology at the same time.

     Perhaps, however, we do need to come alongside and make sure we aren’t missing something. Human beings have a love-hate relationship with money.  We love money, and we sort of hate that about ourselves because we know that the Bible is right – the love of money is the root of all kinds of evil. Usually, the ones with the most money work pretty hard to ensure that it stays that way.  Culturally, statistics bear this out.  Over the last several decades, the average income of the working class has remained flat, while the wealthiest 10% of our population experienced a 20% increase, and the wealthiest 1% a 30% increase during that same time period.  And it’s not because those who work aren’t producing. In fact, production is up significantly – today’s worker produces much more than previous generations. What has happened is that those with money and power are able to craft the rules to benefit themselves.  This comes via ways to protect their assets and limit their taxes – things which are simply not available to regular, everyday people.  So, let us continue to be angry at the top 1%, and pray that Jeff Bezos may one day pay a dollar or two of income tax like the rest of us.

     Closer to home, however, there may be a more relevant issue to consider.  The intimation of the context is that the rich guy was not known for his generosity toward others, which is why the instruction was too difficult to swallow.  Jesus is really teaching into a broader issue: what does it mean to be a person who strives to follow the Way of faith?  In short, when we are grounded and founded in the love of God, we more naturally love what God loves.  The idea was never that we pick up a long list of ultimatums, but rather that we grow into a way of life that is in lockstep with God.  Over the past few weeks, we have seen Jesus standing up for the underdogs.  Here, he shines a light on the poor who are almost always powerless to improve their situation. They need those who “have” to help them who “have not”.  God draws especially close to underdogs because they often need it most. The question we have been asked is do we care? If so, is that care reflected in the way we steward our money?  It turns out God is interested in economics on all levels.  How we spend our money tells a story. How much we give to help others is one indicator of our hearts’ alignment with God.

     Sometimes we tell ourselves that we would do more if we had more.  This makes us feel better. Sometimes, however, this isn’t very honest because there might be areas we can tighten up so that we can do more for those who are vulnerable.  Sometimes we are called to sacrifice for others.  When it is born out love it is a beautiful thing.  When it is born out of obligation or transaction, there is always something lacking.

     How are you doing in this area of your life?  Do you give thinking it will somehow trigger blessings from God?  Do you realize what that implies?  How has your love of God and natural love of others made its way into your budget? Are there any areas that need to be addressed?  

     Related side note...  Thank you for the support you provide for CrossWalk.  We can be a beacon of hope and help for many people in Napa because of your generosity.  We want to move forward, faster, which depends on strong support.  We appreciate any help you can give.  Yet God will love you – and so will CrossWalk – even if you don’t!

 

Commentary...

 

Twentieth Week after Pentecost (Year B): Mark 10:17-31

Check out SALT’s “Strange New World” podcast episode on this passage, “Understanding Jesus - Part Five: The Camel and the Needle.”

Big Picture:

1) This is the seventh week of a twelve-week chronological walk through several chapters in the Gospel of Mark.

2) Jesus has been teaching his disciples about what it means to follow him: tapping into the deeper physics of love and humility, being a “servant of all,” making peace with friends and enemies, viewing cultural institutions (like marriage and divorce) through the lens of serving the most vulnerable — and now, in this week’s reading, sharing economic resources with people in need.

3) Not surprisingly, since it includes Jesus’ directive to “sell what you own, and give the money to the poor,” this passage has been one of the most controversial — and most, um, “creatively” interpreted — in Christian history. Monastics point to it as the basis for a monk’s vow to poverty. Others insist Jesus only meant his advice to apply to the rich man himself; or only to the extremely rich; or only to a special inner circle of followers. Still others argue that Jesus’ real concern here is “attachment” to wealth, not the mere possession of it; or that the story is meant to underscore that salvation comes not from human feats of piety, much less from material resources, but rather from God’s grace alone. Each of these options has merit — and yet, as we’ll see below, each fails to do full justice to the story. Indeed, the story resists reduction to any simple formula: it’s a challenging, haunting, and distinctive episode, not least because it’s the only one in which Jesus calls someone to follow him and gets turned down.

4) Some stories include teachings that are informative and instructive. Others mark out the boundaries of a kind of “squared circle” (an old name for a wrestling ring), a space for grappling with important principles and how they may or may not apply in our everyday lives. This story is a “squared circle” story: its upshot isn’t to settle the issue of how faith relates to money, but rather to provide us with a framework within which we can wrestle it out, again and again, over the course of our lives.

5) One excellent backdrop against which to read this passage is theologian David Bentley Hart’s remarkable short essay on the early church’s economic life, “Are Christians Supposed to Be Communists?” His answer to this question, by the way, is both No and Yes. Worth a read!

Scripture:

1) Jesus is “on the way” (another possible translation of the key phrase in Mark 10:17). Specifically, as Mark later makes clear, he is on the way to Jerusalem, and ultimately on the way to Golgotha (Mark 10:32-34). And more broadly, he’s traveling the path of Christian life, the way of discipleship, bearing in mind that “The Way” was one of the earliest names for the movement (see, e.g., Acts 9:219:9). In other words, for Mark, the dialogue with the rich man is fundamentally about what it means to follow Jesus.

2) There’s a lot packed in to the man’s question: “Good Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?” First, the man runs up and kneels before Jesus, an unusual approach and posture for a theological discussion; in Mark, running-up-and-kneeling is more typical of those urgently asking for healing (see, e.g., Mark 1:405:6;5:33) — so we should interpret the man as profoundly struggling in some way. Second, his question presupposes that “eternal life” is inherited by those who have “done” certain things (“What must I do...?”), presumably those who have acted in “good” and righteous ways. And yet Jesus rejects precisely this presupposition in his correction of how the man addresses him: “No one is good but God alone.” On one level, Jesus is saying, Don’t call me “Good Teacher” — but his deeper point is to challenge the question’s premise and the man’s preoccupation, as if to say, You’re looking at this in the wrong way: salvation isn’t a sport in which those who are “good” win the prize. Only God is good. Salvation isn’t earned. You can’t rely on your own efforts, your own “doing” (“What must I do?”), your own resources, your own “goodness.” Salvation is a gift from God, unearned, undeserved, and free!

3) “You lack one thing,” Jesus says, an ironic remark to a man who, with his “many possessions,” ostensibly lacks for nothing. But what exactly is the “one thing” he lacks? Is it moral virtue, the ethical standing that arguably comes from selling everything and giving the proceeds to the poor? Perhaps…but if that were true, if this selling-and-giving were simply the good and right thing for human beings to do, we might expect Jesus to recommend it not only to this man but to the crowds as well, or at least to his disciples — but Jesus doesn’t do that. It’s true that the disciples do give up what they own, leaving behind their boats and nets by the shore, but they don’t sell everything and give the proceeds to the poor. 

4) So if it isn’t moral virtue the man lacks — what is it? Perhaps the clue is the opening exchange about “goodness.” Perhaps the man, preoccupied with “doing good” so as to achieve his own salvation, trusts too much in his own resources, material and otherwise (“What must I do…?”). Perhaps what he lacks is trust in God, who is, after all, the ultimate source of all goodness and salvation. This interpretation would help explain at least two things in the story: first, why the commandments he has followed “since my youth” are the neighbor-oriented commands (5-10 of the Decalogue), not the more explicitly God-oriented ones (1-4 in the Decalogue), suggesting, perhaps, a lack of trust in God; and second, why relinquishing wealth is the specific remedy Jesus prescribes, since that would help dispel the man’s illusion of self-sufficiency and afford him a more vivid, tangible experience of depending on God.

5) On the other hand, however, it’s worth noting that Jesus doesn’t call the man to simply walk away from his possessions, or to burn them in a bonfire, but rather to share their value with neighbors in need. Accordingly, perhaps the “one thing” he lacks is generosity: the joyful sharing of blessings with others. Indeed, one of wealth’s hazards is that it can cut people off from genuine, kind-hearted participation in community, which is to say, from living a fully human life.

6) Whether we interpret the “one thing” the man lacks as trust in God, communal generosity, or both (since these “lacks” are often two symptoms of the same ailment: self-centeredness), one temptation is let ourselves off the material hook. The point here, we tell ourselves, is really about trust and generosity, not about selling everything we own! So yes, by all means, let us become less self-centered — but when it comes to our possessions, well, there’s no need to get carried away...  But again, the story resists this kind of rationalization. If possessions are a corrupting barrier for this man (and indeed for the disciples, who also left everything behind in order to follow Jesus) — why wouldn’t they also be corrupting barriers for us? If this man lacked trust in God, or generosity to his neighbors — are we really so sure we don’t lack these things, too? In short, if Jesus framed the life of first-century discipleship in startlingly material terms, as a way of life with concrete economic aspects — why would twenty-first-century discipleship be any different?

7) In the ancient world (as in many circles today), wealth was widely considered a sign of divine blessing, which is why the disciples are so taken aback when Jesus declares that it’s “easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God” (Mark 10:25). “Then who can be saved?” they incredulously ask, as if to say, If even they, the apparently blessed, cannot be saved — who can be? Jesus’ reply makes two points at once: first, that the apparent blessings of wealth are actually more like hazardous obstacles; and second, that while such obstacles can seem to put the kingdom of God out of reach, “for God all things are possible” (Mark 10:27).

Takeaways:

1) Jesus’ call to “sell what you own, and give the money to the poor” isn’t a one-size-fits-all command meant for everyone — if it were, he would have announced it more broadly, starting with his disciples. Instead, there’s something about this particular man that gives rise to Jesus’ advice: perhaps his preoccupation with his own efforts and resources, betraying a lack of trust in God as the source of salvation; or perhaps his lack of generosity with regard to others in need; or indeed, perhaps both. Pious and earnest as he is, he’s nevertheless self-centered, oriented away from both God and neighbor.

2) But if the call to “sell and give” isn’t for everyone, it could still be for us. We shouldn’t be quick to declare immunity; the rich man’s malady may be a condition for which we, too, require healing. And in any case, for Jesus (and for Mark), discipleship has significant economic consequences that demand to be taken seriously. Peter’s contention that the disciples have done at least part of what the rich man refused to do (Hey, we left everything and followed you!) is evidence enough that Mark believes the economic consequences of the Gospel apply to more than just this one rich man (Mark 10:28-31). 

3) But there’s plenty of other evidence as well: as the Book of Acts has it, the earliest Christian communities sold their assets, pooled the proceeds and “held them in common,” distributing them “to each as any had need” (Acts 4:32-35). Mark’s community shared a similar ethos, valuing a communal form of economic life for which many “left everything” in order to follow Jesus (Mark 10:28). Private wealth, then, had no place in this form of life, and significant private wealth was for many — here the rich man is Exhibit A — an impediment to joining the movement. Accordingly, for Christians today living in a world riven by increasing economic inequality, this challenging, haunting story pushes us to confront just what the economic dimensions of the Gospel might look like in our lives. In short, the church is called to be not just a “holy” community, not just a “moral” community, but a decidedly economic community as well, a movement following a savior who insisted again and again that faith and money are sides of one coin, not two.

4) The good news of the Gospel in this week’s passage is that God’s grace, not our own efforts at being “good,” is the source of salvation; that Jesus “looks at us and loves us” (Mark 10:21), and so invites us to move beyond concerns with our own inheritance and focus instead on sharing our resources with others in need; and that God seeks to transform even and especially our economic lives into beautiful, humane, generative patterns of love and grace. In the end, human beings are economic creatures; we are more than economic, of course, but not less! And so it only makes sense that God’s salvation would include definite effects on our economic form of life, just as it did for the earliest disciples. As we struggle together to figure out what those economic effects might be, we can take heart that Jesus sees us, and loves us, and calls us forward — and above all, that “for God, all things are possible.”

 

Mark 10:17-31 (MSG)

As he went out into the street, a man came running up, greeted him with great reverence, and asked, "Good Teacher, what must I do to get eternal life?"

     Jesus said, "Why are you calling me good? No one is good, only God. You know the commandments: Don't murder, don't commit adultery, don't steal, don't lie, don't cheat, honor your father and mother."

     He said, "Teacher, I have—from my youth—kept them all!"

     Jesus looked him hard in the eye—and loved him! He said, "There's one thing left: Go sell whatever you own and give it to the poor. All your wealth will then be heavenly wealth. And come follow me."

     The man's face clouded over. This was the last thing he expected to hear, and he walked off with a heavy heart. He was holding on tight to a lot of things, and not about to let go.

Looking at his disciples, Jesus said, "Do you have any idea how difficult it is for people who 'have it all' to enter God's kingdom?" The disciples couldn't believe what they were hearing, but Jesus kept on: "You can't imagine how difficult. I'd say it's easier for a camel to go through a needle's eye than for the rich to get into God's kingdom."

     That set the disciples back on their heels. "Then who has any chance at all?" they asked.

Jesus was blunt: "No chance at all if you think you can pull it off by yourself. Every chance in the world if you let God do it."

     Peter tried another angle: "We left everything and followed you."

     Jesus said, "Mark my words, no one who sacrifices house, brothers, sisters, mother, father, children, land—whatever—because of me and the Message will lose out. They'll get it all back, but multiplied many times in homes, brothers, sisters, mothers, children, and land—but also in troubles. And then the bonus of eternal life! This is once again the Great Reversal: Many who are first will end up last, and the last first."

Lessons from Another ET

Note: You can watch this teaching on CrossWalk’s YouTube channel.

In 1982, the world received a gift from Steven Spielberg, E.T.: The Extra Terrestrial.  It became the highest grossing film of the 1980’s and is an enduring classic.  Take a second and think about the film.  What do you remember about it?  What lines have stuck with culture? What image captures the film in our memory?

     Given that the film features an alien from another planet, it is easy to put the movie onto the Sci-Fi shelf in our brains.  As interesting as ET was, however, it was about much more than a visitor from outer space.  Ten-year-old Elliott Taylor was the fortunate boy who discovered and eventually befriended the alien and helped him get back home.  Elliott’s parents had divorced, and he felt like he was all alone in another world.  E.T. the alien, and E.T., the boy, were both in need of friendship and support as they figured out how to get back home.  The movie is really about that, which also happens to be about an alien from another planet who really did come in peace.  To focus too much time on the Sci-Fi aspect of the film would be a massive exercise in missing the point of the film. This was a film about being lost, finding friendship, and finding one’s way home.

     Sometimes we do the same thing with scripture.  We read a text and it seems so obvious to us what it is about that we just go one our merry way.  Sometimes, however, what seems like the point of a text after a casual glance isn’t really accurate.  While we could keep on walking and stick with our assumptions, we may be missing the whole intent of a particular text.  This week provides a great example for us to consider: one scene about divorce and another about children.  Both need contextualizing in order to be fully appreciated and relevantly applied.

     The divorce exchange was a test posed by the Jewish religious leaders in an attempt to get Jesus in trouble.  The word “should” is a huge giveaway on that.  The Pharisees already knew that there was legal precedent that allowed for divorce dating back to very early legal codes with ancient Judaism.  They weren’t really concerned about answering the legal question that had already been settled and was well known.  They were wanting him to say out loud, in public, that people shouldn’t get divorced.  They likely already knew that that was his interpretation because of his close association with John the Baptist.  They were probably hoping that Jesus would suffer a similar fate as Jesus.  The governor of the region in which Jesus did his ministry was Herod Antipas, who found himself in a public scandal when he married his brother’s ex-wife.  His new wife became available by divorcing from his brother.  The only reason she divorced his brother was to marry Herod.  When John the Baptist openly challenged it – voicing the opinion of most of the people under his rule – he found himself eventually arrested and killed.  Perhaps if Jesus took the same stance in public, he would be out of the picture, too.  It wasn’t just Herod, though, who seemed to ruffle the feathers of ordinary Jewish folks.  Religious leaders themselves had gained the reputation for doing the same thing, divorcing their wives, trading them in for a newer model.  Both Herod and the Pharisees were trying to get away with what they could given the legal options afforded them.  Their casual, callous actions were an afront to a much deeper concern that Jesus addressed that is still relevant today.

     Instead of engaging in a legal debate, Jesus focused the attention on the original idea of marriage as a covenant of union, a picture of what the God-human relationship was supposed to look like: two persons choosing to commit to each other, to love one another, serve one another, look out for one another, sacrifice for one another, submit to one another, through thick and thin for the rest of their lives.  In reminding the disciples of what the original intent was supposed to be, those who had violated that intent were easily recognized.  The more accurate way to frame the question Jesus was handling would be something like this: should someone treat their covenant casually, to the point that they abandon the hard work required of true union in favor of an easy out?  To that, Jesus would say “no”.

     God hates divorce, of course, just like everyone on the planet.  It represents dashed dreams, brokenness, severed union, and generally a lot of pain and suffering.  Yet divorce was allowed in the Jewish legal code because it really, really needed to be there – and was “endorsed” by God.  Why?  Because humanity.  Things don’t always go perfectly in myriad ways, from people choosing to grow apart rather than closer together, to one partner not engaging as much as the other, to substance abuse, domestic violence, and more.  Divorce needs to be available because “humanity”.  God hates all that it means, yet God – I am certain – favors it over marriages that really need to be dissolved.  However, I don’t believe God is in favor of entering into marriage or divorce lightly, which is really the issue Jesus was addressing.  Jesus is drawing attention to a higher view of life and living – according to the Way of God and not the ways of the world.

     Unfortunately, this passage has been weaponized against divorced people, and particularly against women who were not equal players in the ancient world.  Women were, for the most part, deeply dependent on their fathers or husbands for their wellbeing.  Getting remarried after divorce was very difficult.  For those Jewish leaders to cast their wives by the side of the road with divorce was tantamount to them sentencing their ex’s to extreme poverty.  That was an injustice and still is.  Even today, women fare much worse than men on the whole in terms of financial security when divorce hits.  This is due in part to the fact that there is still a wage gap between men and women, and in cases where kids are involved, women more often than men in various ways choose to tap the brakes on their careers to raise their kids.  That’s many years of not-as-focused career development, which results in lower income and less benefits. This passage, therefore, while it is about choosing the higher Way of God is also about protecting those who were most likely to be victimized by choosing the lesser way: vulnerable women and children.

     Mark’s Gospel then has Jesus in a teaching environment, interrupted by kids.  The disciples, in true ways-of-the-world fashion, shooed them away, which ticked Jesus off.  This may have surprised the disciples who thought they were honoring Jesus and his audience by protecting his capacity to teach well.  What’s happening here?  Picture the scene.  If kids are present while he is teaching and being with people, who else is likely present?  Their mothers.  While Jesus is okay with the presence of kids – more than okay as you’ll soon realize – their being there meant their moms were, too – which was not usually afforded to women in that time.

     The greater concern that Jesus raised, however, has to do with our determining who is worthy of being in the room and who is not.  We have reason to believe that the romantic notions we have about children and their “welcome everywhere” were not as prevalent then as now.  In fact, children, in terms of social mores, were not welcome in such places and seen as undeserving to be in the room.  They didn’t deserve to be there.  That’s the major point Jesus wanted to drive home here.  The disciples were steeped in meritocracy, where we earn the right to be in the room, especially if that room was God’s.  That’s not how God sees it.  God welcomes everyone, especially those who do not feel worthy.  Does this mean God favors some more than others?  No, it means that people who feel unworthy need to hear that how they feel about themselves, or how the world feels about them, is not how God feels.  That’s why paying attention to individuals and people groups that are treated as second class citizens is key to ushering in the Kingdom of God and being faithful Jesus followers: we are announcing and embodying a different Way that is opposed to the tit-for-tat culture that reigns supreme.

     To welcome the child is counter-cultural and unnerving to all involved.  Identifying as children before God, for the disciples, would be a decision to embrace the truly radical truth that we are loved and accepted not because of anything we have done, but because the nature of God is loving acceptance.  A better example in our culture may be a homeless person or a refugee who is utterly dependent on others for survival.  Our culture celebrates independence as the sure sign of success, and attributes failure to those who are less so.  Jesus is saying that in our understanding of our standing with God, we need to embrace the image of being a dependent of God.  Because we are.

     Steven Spielberg was doing more than creating a lovely film – he was telling his own story.  He himself had grown up in a suburb with parents who divorced, which left him reeling.  He was in many ways sharing key understanding from his own journey – a message that needed to be heard because it resonates with so many.  A message hidden in plain view.  So it is with the scriptures.  So much wisdom from the Spirit of God worked out through the remembered stories, all wanting us to hear truly Good News: there is another way which is rooted in the Source of all that is.  That Way leads us home if we will recognize it and choose it. A Way that is deeper than the worlds’ ways, and a Way that keeps our tendency to elevate ourselves over others in check.  It is a Way of truly loving our neighbor as well as ourselves.  May it be so for all of us.

 

Questions...

  1. How is the core teaching of these two scenes different than what you may have initially thought? What was your experience like of that discovery?

  2. In your own words, what do you think Jesus was trying to communicate to his audience(s) originally?  How do you think Jesus might apply his teaching today?  What might be the subjects he would address in our time and culture?

  3. Where in your life do you feel the tension between the ways of the world and the Way of the Spirit of God?  What is the issue?  How would you describe the contrast between the way of the world and the Way of Jesus?  What do you sense God inviting you toward?  What makes it tough?  What about it is compelling? What might the outcomes be depending on which way you choose?

  4. Given that the Way of the Spirit of God is different from the ways of the world, courage is always required on some level.  Remember that there exists a great cloud of witnesses cheering you on, whispering in your ear, “Take the risk! The Spirit is all there really is – you have nothing to lose and everything to gain!”

Commentary from SaltProject.org

Nineteenth Week after Pentecost (Year B): Mark 10:2-16

Big Picture:

1) This is the sixth week of a twelve-week chronological walk through several chapters in the Gospel of Mark.

2) Jesus has been teaching his disciples about being “servants of all,” including children (despite their lack of power or status) and religious outsiders (despite their apparent threat as “competitors”). In both cases, Jesus turns the conventional notion of “service” on its head: a servant typically works for someone more powerful than she is, and what’s more, her service is typically reserved for those within the fold, not external rivals. For Jesus, however, being a “servant of all” means caring not only for “insiders,” but also — and especially — for relatively powerless outsiders, the left out and left behind. And in this week’s passage, Jesus continues to develop this theme of serving the vulnerable, this time in the context of marriage and divorce.

3) It’s crucially important to start here: In first century Palestine, marriage and divorce were profoundly patriarchal institutions in which women and children were technically considered the property of men. By contrast, in ancient Roman society, both husbands and wives could initiate divorce, and there’s evidence that at least some Jewish wives could, too — but in the main, Jewish law traditionally gave that power to husbands, as Deuteronomy 24:1-4 makes clear. The proper grounds for divorce, however, were a matter of considerable dispute in Jesus’ day. Some taught that only adultery could trigger divorce (Jesus himself takes this view in Matthew 19:9); others followed Deuteronomy’s broader standard that anything “objectionable about her” — that is, objectionable to the husband — could suffice (Deut 24:1). Moreover, women and their children were highly dependent on marriage for their livelihood and wellbeing, and this dependence, combined with their husbands’ ability to initiate divorce, put women and children in an acutely vulnerable position. To understand Jesus’ teaching on divorce, we have to bear this first-century Near Eastern context in mind. Who is vulnerable in this picture? Women and children.

4) Though Jesus seems to issue a straightforward, blanket prohibition against divorce in this passage, once we start to dig in, important complexities emerge. First, as we have seen along the way in Mark, Jesus often speaks in striking, hyperbolic terms in order to provoke his listeners, and to convey his ideas in bold brush strokes. (This is a rabbi who’s just said, “If your eye causes you to stumble, tear it out” — not someone to take too literally! (Mark 9:47))  Second, since our twenty-first-century context is so different than his first-century one, we’re wise to focus less on statutory details and more on underlying principles. Third, it’s worth noting that many of the earliest Christian communities didn’t take a categorical view of divorce. Matthew (likely writing shortly after Mark) includes an adultery exception (Matthew 19:9); Paul (writing shortly after Jesus’ death) also permits divorce in certain circumstances (1 Cor 7:15). Fourth, Jesus’ teaching — in this passage and elsewhere — often showcases a relatively supple, principle-oriented understanding of how the law works in practice. In this story, for example, he substantively reframes Deuteronomy 24:1-4, thereby casting the law as adaptable; and he explains that Moses permits divorce “because of your hardness of heart,” thereby casting the law as sensitive to human weakness (Mark 10:5). Indeed, one of Jesus’ signature ideas is that, in difficult cases, the law should be flexibly interpreted for the sake of human flourishing: the law was made for humanity, not humanity for the law (see, e.g., Mark 2:27). And fifth, as we’ll see below, a close reading of this passage reveals that Jesus isn’t actually interested in categorically prohibiting divorce, but rather in positioning it as a last resort.

Scripture:

1) Some Pharisees ask Jesus if divorce is lawful, in order “to test him” — but why would this be a test? Perhaps because the issue was divisive enough that any answer Jesus gives will be unpopular. Or perhaps they have another kind of trap in mind: the only other (implicit) reference to divorce in the Gospel of Mark is the story of Herod and Herodias, in which John the Baptizer criticizes their marriage as “not lawful” — no doubt at least partly because Herodias had to divorce Herod’s brother first (Mark 6:18). In other words, the question may be a “test” because of its potential to lure Jesus into criticizing Herod — a move that didn’t turn out too well for John!

2) Turning the tables, Jesus has his questioners answer their own question — and they reply, Yes, divorce is lawful, citing Deuteronomy 24:1-4. Now, the central point of that ancient text is to prohibit people from remarrying each other for a second time, after the wife’s been married to someone else in the interim. But along the way, the passage conjures up a world of common and capricious divorce, with men simply deciding that “she does not please him,” or finding “something objectionable about her,” and then ending the marriage (Deut 24:1). To this patriarchal ethos of divorce on-(male)-demand, Jesus objects. He reframes Deuteronomy’s permission as an accommodation to human “hardness of heart” (Mark 10:5). God’s original vision for marriage, Jesus insists, is that two people are inseparably joined and become “one flesh” (Mark 10:8Gen 2:24). Likewise, privately with his disciples, Jesus equates remarriage with adultery — strikingly phrasing his teaching in egalitarian terms, as though both men and women have equal agency: “...divorces his wife...divorces her husband…” (Mark 10:11-12).

3) Is this a categorical prohibition of divorce? On one level, Jesus is clearly critical of divorce in this passage, contrasting it with the divine ideal of becoming “one flesh.” But on the other hand, it’s striking that he draws this contrast without declaring Deuteronomy’s permission null and void. He doesn’t say, Moses was mistaken. Nor does he say, The divorce described in Deuteronomy is no longer valid. Rather, he effectively says, What Moses says about divorce is well and good, but don’t forget: it’s an accommodation to human weakness, not an expression of the divine ideal. On the contrary, God’s ideal vision for marriage is that it entails becoming “one flesh,” two people who care for each other to such an intimate, life-giving degree that they become one, and they cannot be torn asunder. Don’t take that vision lightly. Strive toward it as best you can, and reserve divorce as a last resort. And to men, in particular, who might be tempted to take advantage of Moses’ words, “she does not please him” or “something objectionable about her” — think again! God calls you not to be selfish, entitled, and cavalier, but rather to be humble, to serve your spouse, and to serve your children.

4) As it turns out, then, Jesus’ view isn’t a categorical prohibition of divorce, but rather a prohibition of cavalier, contemptuous forms of divorce and tearing asunder. Deuteronomy’s permission still stands — though it’s properly understood, Jesus contends, in light of the divine ideal outlined “from the beginning of creation” (Mark 10:6). That ideal is this: two married people becoming “bone of each other’s bone, and flesh of each other’s flesh,” caring for each other as though they are caring for themselves. It’s how many people picture an ideal partnership — and it’s what many couples aspire to, even when it doesn’t come to pass. What’s more, lifting up this ideal is perfectly consistent with the notion that a marriage sadly falling far short of it, a marriage that creates more harm than good, is indeed rightly ended. But Jesus wants to ensure that our default position is to strive for the “one flesh” ideal — with divorce reserved as a last resort, to be used not when, say, “she does not please him,” but rather when the partnership becomes injurious to one or both partners.

5) Why does Jesus insist upon striving for the “bone of my bone,” “one flesh” ideal? Marriage isn’t for everyone, but for many people, a lifelong intimate partnership can be a key source of growth and happiness. And just as important, in the ancient world marriages could create sanctuaries of livelihood and wellbeing for women and children — and conversely, divorces could put women and children out into harm’s way. Here lies the deep kinship between Jesus’ teaching on divorce and his practice of welcoming children: Jesus is always specially concerned with protecting and advocating for the most vulnerable. And not only because they are exposed to harm! Children, he says, can be open-minded, open-hearted, and therefore receptive to God’s blessings in exemplary ways. The rest of us should follow their lead: “Whoever does not receive the kingdom of God as a little child will never enter it” (Mark 10:15). 

Takeaways:

1) For many, the good news of the Gospel in this passage is that Jesus does not condemn divorce categorically, but rather positions it as a last resort. This may be received as good news both by many whose lives have been affected by divorce, and at the same time, by many who value marital commitment as something to strive to preserve. 

2) The challenge of the Gospel in this passage is that God’s ideal vision for marriage — and by extension, any lifelong partnership — is of an intimate, inseparable bond, a union in which two people become “one flesh,” caring for each other as if caring for themselves, and thereby a sacramental training ground for caring for the wider world. This ideal vision can be an inspiring, daunting challenge. What does it look and feel like to be “one flesh”? What practical wisdom, what best practices might help along the way? Imagine hearing testimony and advice from people in longstanding partnerships, from various generations, about this important subject...

3) And finally, for married and unmarried people alike, the good news of the Gospel in this passage is that God cares especially for the most vulnerable, and calls us to do the same. Jesus evaluates social institutions (like marriage and divorce) through this lens, and he sees social groups (like children or outsiders) through it, too. Such groups deserve respect and protection, of course, but it’s also true that their wisdom and perspective deserve attention — not least because of what they can teach the wider community about faith, love, and “receiving the kingdom of God” (Mark 10:15).

Deconstructing Hell, Reconstructing God

Note: You can watch this teaching on CrossWalk’s YouTube channel.

This week’s texts from the Lectionary give us much to chew on and an opportunity to revisit our hermeneutical approach to studying biblical text (fancy speech for how we understand what the original text meant to the original audience in context, and our method of applying it to our present context).  Here are some of my thoughts...

     Hermeneutic.  God didn’t write the Bible. God doesn’t have hands to hold quills, pens, or click keyboards.  God does work in cooperation with human beings. The Spirit of God is always present everywhere in everything working toward shalom – wellbeing and harmony for all, including creation itself.  The Bible was written by thoughtful, prayerful, faithful people trying to express their experience and beliefs about God.  God was surely expressly invited into that process, and the writers were no doubt trying their best to be responsive to the nudges of the Spirit with every jot and tittle.  The writers wrote from their context, which included their worldview formed by all the life experience they brought to the table.  The fact that what these writers wrote was added to the collection of texts that formed the canon – the standard – means that the collective community believed that the writings were aligned with held beliefs and worthy of study.  It doesn’t mean that the writings were perfect.  Also, none of the biblical texts were originally written in English.  The Old Testament was written in Hebrew.  The New Testament in Greek.  Jesus spoke Aramaic – a form of Hebrew – which was eventually translated into Greek.  Hebrew and Aramaic don’t always translate well into Greek.  Greek words sometimes have multiple meanings and don’t easily translate into English, which is why we have so many English translations of the Bible.  Sometimes those original words are loaded with meaning that are lost on us unless we study them carefully.  Sometimes errant translations become so comfortable that we assume they must be correct even if they are not.  The challenge of biblical study is to see all of this as clearly as possible to limit the misinterpretation and misapplication of what the writer is trying to communicate to us.  This process is called our hermeneutical approach to the study of biblical text. Simple. ;)

     Others.  The disciples saw someone who was not a card-carrying member of the Jesus community doing Jesus-related stuff.  Oh no!  What was their reaction?  How dare they!  Who do they think they are?  We are the only ones authorized to do Jesus-related stuff!  I find this so interesting and a bit humiliating as the same dynamics are still in play today.  Unfortunately, I have been guilty of the same reaction, especially in my earlier years, when I viewed Christianity and my role as a pastor differently than I do now. I used to be more concerned with who had the “most right” beliefs and therefore who was most right!  Interestingly, I somehow always found myself in the “most right” camp!  One unfortunate byproduct of this orientation is that it lends itself toward protectionism and even efforts to disenfranchise those who disagree with the “most right” camp, even if they are simply another perspective within Christianity!  God help me!  God forgive me.

     Jesus’ response, of course, was to enlarge their puny vision.  Jesus was not really into copyrighting his stuff.  He was open to the collective embrace, understanding, and application of the Good News rather than trying to control how it should be done by everyone, everywhere.  He recognized the Spirit of God was already at work everywhere in everyone.  It wasn’t like he controlled it.  He modeled what living and responding to the Spirit looked like.  Others saw it, caught it, adopted it, and learned to live in it as well.  The Good News is that God loves us, is with us, and is for us forever. The “us” is everyone, not just “us”.  How the Spirit flows and is understood depends on who the receiver is, and thus will be expressed somewhat differently.  The flow of the Spirit will always look, sound, smell, and feel like love – that’s what we look for and celebrate!  How much lovelier would it be if churches and their leaders stopped spending time arguing about who is more right and more time celebrating where the Spirit of God is clearly at work!  Even beyond the Church and Christianity!  How cruel would God be if God was sitting on such Good News and limited its distribution to only the Church?  How many billions of people would be left out today?  It takes nothing away from Jesus or Christianity to suggest that the Spirit also speaks through other religious traditions.  Our resistance to this idea is rooted in a protectionism born from an understandably narrow rendering of the revelation of God.  Two things can be true at once: there can be distinctives taught about the Spirit that are in contradistinction to ways of thinking in the world at large, and there can be more than one source acting as a conduit for those distinctives.  I think Jesus was making just this point in this brief story.

     Hell.  The next section jumps into what appears to be an unrelated discourse (because it probably was).  The Gospel writers had their collection of stories and sayings and did the best they could to organize them.  Sometimes the flow is really good.  Sometimes, like in this passage, it isn’t.  In these middle six verses, Jesus is telling people to do whatever it takes to stop their destructive behavior, lest they experience worse consequences than they already have.  The consequence most English translations say awaits?  Hell.  Gulp!  Teach a child (wittingly or unwittingly) to carry on a sinful pattern?  Hell.  Do something with your hand that isn’t shalom?  You’re toast.  Allow your feet to take you somewhere you shouldn’t?  Get ready for some heat.  Viewing some porn?  You’re going to burn.  Youth pastors and parents and Jonathon Edwards have kept these verses in their quiver and shot their kids with them whenever errant behavior loomed.  Jesus appears to be suggesting that the consequences of a temporal, finite sin is an eternal threat of torture.  What do we make of this?  Does this make sense?

     I have taught on the subject of hell before.  I recommend two well researched books that will help you unpack the overview I am about to offer.  Rob Bell’s Love Wins woke a lot of people up to what we’re talking about here, and Donald Emmel’s Eliminating Satan and Hell both offer good scholarship and a theology that help makes sense out of this subject.  I will be featuring a special class featuring a teaching from Meghan Henning – an expert on the subject. The Jewish people didn’t really write much about life after death until roughly 300 years before Jesus was born, which is after the last book of the Old Testament was written.  Let that sink in.  They didn’t really give it much thought.  And then they did.  Why?  Scholars believe that their interest and writing were in response to a justice issue.  If God was not going to reward Israel for their faithfulness in this life, perhaps God would do so in what lies beyond the grave.  Furthermore, if God wasn’t going to mete out justice on those who worked against what God was up to in this life, perhaps God would make them pay after they died.  Some folks within ancient Judaism developed a pretty elaborate understanding of where we go after death, with four chambers – two for good folks and two for bad – depending on how you lived your life.  The good chambers were either really good and comfortable or really, really, really good and comfortable.  Similarly, the bad chambers ranged from awful to horrifying.  By the time Jesus was born, popular thought had embraced such notions of rewards and punishments after death, likely borrowing some imagery from other religious traditions.  Jesus’ parable of the rich man and Lazarus provide a good example of ancient thought.  The word hell is important to exegete in the passage we are looking at today.  The Greek word for hell in this passage is Gehenna, which is a translation from the Hebrew word Ben Hinnom.  Historically, this was the location of terrible acts of pagan worship including child sacrifice.  It was considered a horrible example of a defiled place.  Anybody with a basic understanding of Jewish history would know this, and associate it with a place where God’s covenant was violated.  An awful, unholy place.

     In past teaching, I have taught that these words refer to a valley just outside of ancient Jerusalem which was used as the city dump where trash was burned around the clock, rotting refuse was constantly being eaten by worms and maggots, leftover food and flesh would be fought over by wild dogs that would gnash their teeth at each other, and a place where the poorest of the poor who were not otherwise provided for would be disposed of here upon death, leaving their loved ones to weep tears of sorrow and shame.  Never ending fire.  Worms and maggots.  Gnashing of teeth. Constant weeping and suffering.  Sound familiar?  Sound like hell?  Yep.  I had learned and understood this to be an accurate rendering of the first century CE landscape.  I have recently learned (from Meghan Henning) that this idea was based on rabbinical writings from the medieval period when the city dump did exist in that valley.  However, there is no evidence that such a dump existed at Jesus’ time, and therefore we have to hold on loosely to that view or let it go entirely.  This is inconvenient!  Being able to explain away that Jesus really didn’t believe in an afterlife experience where some level of punishment existed was super handy.  The reality is that he used familiar rhetorical devices related to the subject of the afterlife, and that he may have believed in such a space himself – we simply cannot know. The New Testament writers do not speak with one voice or view on this, and we have to live with it. There is a lot to think about here that goes beyond the scope of this teaching.  There are good resources available to help us understand the development of thought on the afterlife. Be warned, however, that being exposed to good research may mess with your view of the Bible and how we engage and interpret it! Expect to be uncomfortable!

     What we can be sure of is that whenever Jesus used this rhetorical device, he tied it to ethical living. The point he was trying to make every time was that living in the Way mattered.  A lot.  Reckless living could lead to an early death, or it could lead to being associated with an unholy space or throwing your life away.  He wasn’t trying to make a case for a torturous afterlife, but he did assume everybody already understood the reference and used it to persuade them to live lives aligned with the Spirit of God.

     Salty BBQ.  The final saying seems tacked on because it probably was.  In the first line, Jesus is giving a word of comfort: everyone will be tested with fire.  How is that comforting?  We’re not singled out – everybody goes through hell at various points in their lives.  The last verse dealing with salt teaches something a bit different but is sort of related.  Salt, as an element, doesn’t lose its saltiness.  It can’t.  What can happen, however, is dilution.  Gypsum looks like salt but isn’t. Gypsum is the material that gives us sheetrock used in construction.  You may not be able to tell with a casual glance which is which – but you surely can tell the difference in taste!  I think what Jesus is teaching here – and why Mark put these verses together – is that we need to be careful with our lives.  What we allow in and what we keep out of our lives makes a massive difference for ourselves as well as the world.  Let too much gypsum in?  It’s like throwing your life away.  From bad ideas to unaddressed emotions to terrible choices, it all matters.  The consequences are real in this life, affect our individual life, impact the lives immediately around us and in some ways also alter all of creation.  Your life matters to more than just you.  Given the impact your life has, what are you doing with it?

 

Questions to journal through...

1.     Why do you suppose the disciples – and human beings in general – wanted to be the only ones with the authority to carry out the ministry of Jesus?  How have we seen this pattern repeated throughout history in various forms?  How has this been true of you?  What has helped you recognize this ego need and manage it better?

2.     What is it about humanity that wants hell to exist?  What kind of God would cause people to suffer a torturous eternity for committing temporal egregious acts? Where is justice in that?  If hell is off the table, why in the world would anybody want to follow in the footsteps of Jesus? If hell is off the table, what was Jesus trying to communicate with his life and teaching?

3.     What is it about humanity that allows salt to be diluted with gypsum, that which is born of the Spirit with that which is not?  When have you recognized such behavior in your own life?  What helped you see the gypsum for what it was?  What gypsum are you allowing into the mix now that will diminish the good work of the Spirit – and your very experience of life?

4.     What is the Good News Jesus was trying to proclaim?  How is that similar to the Good News that captured our hearts?  How might we make this Good News known in ways like Jesus?

 

Mark 9:38-50 (NLT)

38 John said to Jesus, “Teacher, we saw someone using your name to cast out demons, but we told him to stop because he wasn’t in our group.” 

39 “Don’t stop him!” Jesus said. “No one who performs a miracle in my name will soon be able to speak evil of me. 40 Anyone who is not against us is for us. 41 If anyone gives you even a cup of water because you belong to the Messiah, I tell you the truth, that person will surely be rewarded. 

42 “But if you cause one of these little ones who trusts in me to fall into sin, it would be better for you to be thrown into the sea with a large millstone hung around your neck. 43 If your hand causes you to sin, cut it off. It’s better to enter eternal life with only one hand than to go into the unquenchable fires of hell with two hands. 45 If your foot causes you to sin, cut it off. It’s better to enter eternal life with only one foot than to be thrown into hell with two feet. 47 And if your eye causes you to sin, gouge it out. It’s better to enter the Kingdom of God with only one eye than to have two eyes and be thrown into hell, 48 ‘where the maggots never die and the fire never goes out.’ 

49 “For everyone will be tested with fire. 50 Salt is good for seasoning. But if it loses its flavor, how do you make it salty again? You must have the qualities of salt among yourselves and live in peace with each other.” 

 

James 5:13-20 (NLT)

     13 Are any of you suffering hardships? You should pray. Are any of you happy? You should sing praises. 14 Are any of you sick? You should call for the elders of the church to come and pray over you, anointing you with oil in the name of the Lord. 15 Such a prayer offered in faith will heal the sick, and the Lord will make you well. And if you have committed any sins, you will be forgiven. 

     16 Confess your sins to each other and pray for each other so that you may be healed. The earnest prayer of a righteous person has great power and produces wonderful results. 17 Elijah was as human as we are, and yet when he prayed earnestly that no rain would fall, none fell for three and a half years! 18 Then, when he prayed again, the sky sent down rain and the earth began to yield its crops. 

     19 My dear brothers and sisters, if someone among you wanders away from the truth and is brought back, 20 you can be sure that whoever brings the sinner back from wandering will save that person from death and bring about the forgiveness of many sins.

Nature Boy

Note: You can watch this teaching on CrossWalk’s YouTube channel.

Nature Boy

The greatest thing you’ll ever learn is just to love and be loved in return.

 Here are some thoughts I have from this week’s texts.

 First, some nerd notes... The story of Jesus going to Tyre and Sidon (on the coast of modern-day Lebanon) is fascinating.  Jesus went there to get some time away from Galilee where he probably couldn’t escape crowds and wound up having someone find him to ask for help!  The exchange he has with the pleading mother is raw.  Jesus displays a typical response from a Jewish Rabbi to a Gentile woman, referring to her people as dogs.  While some try to smooth this over as Jesus referring to Gentiles as beloved house pets (there is no evidence to support it in the text or context), such protection of Jesus’ character does more harm than good.  Let Jesus be a human being, a Jewish man from the region of Galilee which was largely an agricultural area that shipped its goods through the ports of Tyre and Sidon.  Poor peasant farmers in Galilee knew that there were people of wealth that were fed by their labor.  They knew there was inequity, and that there was not much they could do about it. These farmers were friends of Jesus, who was a poor carpenter. This story is built on tension related to ethnicity and socioeconomic disparity.

     The pleading mother engages Jesus, who essentially rebuffs her, only to be countered in a way Jesus would normally speak.  The woman accepts the “dog” slur, but then turns it on its head, suggesting by her turn of phrase that a dog who gets crumbs from the table is welcome to do so – is welcome in that space of the family.  Jesus concedes victory to the woman and grants her request.  This isn’t really a story about exorcizing a demon from a little girl; it’s about extending compassion to someone who represents the “other”, maybe even the enemy.  The story that follows about Jesus healing a man, but given that he is in Sidon, we are to be more impressed with the extension of healing to broader parts beyond Israel more than the miracle itself.  James’ text ties in quite nicely, teaching about how favoritism – which is the way many systems in the world work – is incongruent with the way of Jesus. He moves further, saying that faith without works is dead.

     I find these two texts strangely comforting and hopeful.  The fact that Jesus extended grace to a person representing Israel’s oppressor suggests that God’s grace really is for everybody, including me, a dog waiting for crumbs.  I’ll take it!  I also “like” the fact that Jesus was fully human in this story to the point of being rude, and then being humbled by her argument and eventually conceding defeat.  The fact that James needed to write his instruction book on living out the morality of the way of Jesus means that people like me struggled back then just like we do today.  I guess we could conclude that we’re all a bunch of self-centered, biased losers, but I think the greater message is that we are capable of learning and growing and living more and more into who we are created to be.  We will blow it, but that doesn’t need to be the end of the story. In fact, if we are wise, we will honestly examine our mistakes, learn from them, and become healthier, more mature people making the world a better place for everyone.

     How have you grown in this regard over the course of your life?  What has helped you grow?  What keeps you from growing?  What can you incorporate into your life to foster growth?

 

 This Week’s Texts:

Mark 7:24-37 (NLT)

     Then Jesus left Galilee and went north to the region of Tyre. He didn’t want anyone to know which house he was staying in, but he couldn’t keep it a secret. Right away a woman who had heard about him came and fell at his feet. Her little girl was possessed by an evil spirit, and she begged him to cast out the demon from her daughter.

     Since she was a Gentile, born in Syrian Phoenicia, Jesus told her, “First I should feed the children—my own family, the Jews. It isn’t right to take food from the children and throw it to the dogs.”

     She replied, “That’s true, Lord, but even the dogs under the table are allowed to eat the scraps from the children’s plates.”

     “Good answer!” he said. “Now go home, for the demon has left your daughter.” And when she arrived home, she found her little girl lying quietly in bed, and the demon was gone.

     Jesus left Tyre and went up to Sidon before going back to the Sea of Galilee and the region of the Ten Towns. A deaf man with a speech impediment was brought to him, and the people begged Jesus to lay his hands on the man to heal him.

     Jesus led him away from the crowd so they could be alone. He put his fingers into the man’s ears. Then, spitting on his own fingers, he touched the man’s tongue. Looking up to heaven, he sighed and said, “Ephphatha,” which means, “Be opened!” Instantly the man could hear perfectly, and his tongue was freed so he could speak plainly!

     Jesus told the crowd not to tell anyone, but the more he told them not to, the more they spread the news. They were completely amazed and said again and again, “Everything he does is wonderful. He even makes the deaf to hear and gives speech to those who cannot speak.”

 

James 2:1-17 (NLT)

     My dear brothers and sisters, how can you claim to have faith in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ if you favor some people over others?

     For example, suppose someone comes into your meeting dressed in fancy clothes and expensive jewelry, and another comes in who is poor and dressed in dirty clothes. If you give special attention and a good seat to the rich person, but you say to the poor one, “You can stand over there, or else sit on the floor”—well, doesn’t this discrimination show that your judgments are guided by evil motives?

     Listen to me, dear brothers and sisters. Hasn’t God chosen the poor in this world to be rich in faith? Aren’t they the ones who will inherit the Kingdom he promised to those who love him? But you dishonor the poor! Isn’t it the rich who oppress you and drag you into court? Aren’t they the ones who slander Jesus Christ, whose noble name you bear?

     Yes indeed, it is good when you obey the royal law as found in the Scriptures: “Love your neighbor as yourself.” But if you favor some people over others, you are committing a sin. You are guilty of breaking the law.

     For the person who keeps all of the laws except one is as guilty as a person who has broken all of God’s laws. For the same God who said, “You must not commit adultery,” also said, “You must not murder.” So if you murder someone but do not commit adultery, you have still broken the law.

      So whatever you say or whatever you do, remember that you will be judged by the law that sets you free. There will be no mercy for those who have not shown mercy to others. But if you have been merciful, God will be merciful when he judges you.

     What good is it, dear brothers and sisters, if you say you have faith but don’t show it by your actions? Can that kind of faith save anyone? Suppose you see a brother or sister who has no food or clothing, and you say, “Good-bye and have a good day; stay warm and eat well”—but then you don’t give that person any food or clothing. What good does that do?   

     So you see, faith by itself isn’t enough. Unless it produces good deeds, it is dead and useless.